*ár-eh2-

‘what is right, due’

Language
Proto-Anatolian
Grammar
subst
ID
3334

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Hieroglyphic Luwian

/ara/, á-lá/í

‘right’

1.1.1Transmission

This lexeme is attested five times, in inscriptions from Karkamiš, Assur and Tabal, dating from c. 800 BCE to the late 8th century BCE.

[A.P.]

1.1.2Forms

indecl. /ara/ á-lá/í ASSUR letter e, §15 (Assur)
      ASSUR letter e, §17 (Assur)
      ASSUR letter f+g, §14 (Assur)
    (X?)á-lá/í KARKAMIŠ A15b, §7 (Karkamiš)
    ara/i? SUVASA D (Tabal)

At SUVASA D, the shape of the sign 〈ara/i〉 appears to be a cursive version.

KARKAMIŠ A15b, §7 features an unknown sign, probably as a determinative judging by its position in the line. It resembles the shape of a vessel and could hence be a version of the sign (sign *341) vel sim., cf. Yakubovich 2016b:474.

Note that both from a graphemic and a semantic viewpoint, the two adverbs /ara/ ‘right’ and HLuw. /aru/ ‘highly’ are difficult to distinguish, cf. the discussion of the spelling below. In fact, further research may result in some of the attestations for both to undergo reassignment.

[A.P.]

1.1.3Graphic Features

1.1.3.1Phonological Interpretation

The phonological interpretation is proposed by Rieken & Yakubovich 2010a:214, who link the word to Hittite āra ‘right’. The attested spellings bear witness to the wide-spread rhotacism in the late Luwian era and the resulting hypercorrect spellings with signs for laterals and dentals, cf. Melchert 2003b:179-181.

As mentioned above, the present adverb is graphemically and semantically easily confused with /aru/ ‘highly’. Both usually begin with 〈á〉 (*19) and can show rhotacism and hypercorrect spelling of the following resonant. Moreover, the spelling of /u/ is not altogether reliable in this position, alternations can also be observed in the unrelated, but similarly spelt lexeme /aliwann(i)-/ ‘enemy’. Blevins (apud Yakubovich 2008b:14) suggests that these vowels had merged after the flap /ɾ/, which represents earlier intervocalic /r, l, d/ in HLuw. at some point; cf. also Rieken & Yakubovich 2021a:273f.

[AH.B.]

1.1.4Meaning

The current meaning is suggested by Rieken & Yakubovich 2010a:214, comparing Hittite āra ‘right’. The contexts of attestation support the interpretation, although it has to be said that none of them are fully understood to a degree that would render the translations beyond all doubt. Thus, ASSUR letter e, §15-17 runs: á-lá/í-wa/i-za kwa/i-sà-ha a-sa-ti NEG2-wa/i-ma-za-a u-za5-za á-lá/í-ha-wa/i-ma-za u-za5-za, approx. /ara=wa=anz kwis=ha asti na=wa=mmanz unzanz ala=ha=wa=mmanz unzanz/, perhaps translating as ‘Whoever is right to us, (are they) not (right) to you? They (are) right to you’ (Rieken & Yakubovich 2010a:214).Hawkins 2000a:536 analyses the nominal clauses differently and translates ‘Whoever is right to us, you yourselves (are) not, you (are) right for yourselves!’. Both interpretations are grammatically possible, but the one put forward by Rieken & Yakubovich 2010a appears to be contextually more fitting.

The interpretation finds further support in KARKAMIŠ A15b, §7, for which Yakubovich 2016b:474 notes that /ara/ is coordinated with the adverb /sanna/ ‘well, properly’ and therefore likely to belong to the same or at least a similar semantic field.

[AH.B.]

1.1.5Stem

An indeclinable adverb, this word likely represents a lexicalised paradigmatic form of an unattested adjective */ara/i-/ ‘right’ vel sim.

[AH.B.]

1.1.6Derivatives

  1. /aralla(/i)-/

  2. /arawa-(ti)/

  3. /arawann(i)-/

1.2 Cuneiform Luwian

*ara

‘right’

1.2.1Derivatives

  1. aranuwa-(i) (Glossenkeilarannu(wa)-(i))

  2. arallā(i)-(mi)

  3. arawann(i)-

1.2.1.1Uncertain Derivatives

  1. arānašša/i-

1.3 Lycian A

ara-

‘rite (?)’

1.3.1Transmission

This lexeme is attested on the sepulchral inscription (TL 5), the pillar of Xanthos (TL 44), dated stylistically to around 400 BCE and contextually to shortly after the ascension of the Persian emperor Artaxerxes II in 405-404 BCE (Borchhardt & Eichner 1997-1999a:19f.), and the Letoon trilingual inscription (N 320), most commonly dated to 337 BCE, the first year of the Achaemenid king Arses, during the reign of the Carian satrap Pixodaros (Badian 1977a:49f, Bryce 1986a:48f, Keen 1998a:10, Wagner 2011a:156).

[O.B.]

1.3.2Forms

acc. sg. arã N 320.27 (Xanthos)
nom./acc. coll. ara TL 44a.34 (Xanthos)
    N 348.11 (Aloanda)
gen. adj. nom. sg. c. erehi TL 5.5 (Telmessos)

For the appurtenance of the form erehi to this paradigm, see Carruba 1980a:285. With the discovery of Lycian front umlaut, this connection is rendered highly likely.

[O.B.]

1.3.3Meaning

On N 320, the word arã seems to function as the direct object of kumezidi ‘sacrifices, performs a sacrifice’. Hajnal 1994a:144 n. 23 translates the phrase as ‘vollzieht den Ritus’ (taking kumehedi ‘with a sacrificial animal’ as the offering in the rite), which is contextually appropriate (cf. also the meaning ‘rite’ for ara- given in DLL:4 and by Martínez Rodríguez 2018a:281). Melchert (DLL:4) analyzes the collective form ara on TL 44 as adverbial, meaning roughly ‘with the proper religious observances’ (echoing the analysis in Carruba 1977a:310 and Laroche 1979c:103), which is contextually possible (cf. also the Hitt. adverb āra ‘properly’). See Carruba 1980a:285 for the attestation on TL 5 and Neumann 2007a:17 for a number of outdated analyses.

[O.B.]

1.3.4Stem

The acc. sg. form arã proves that ara- is a common gender a-stem (cited as such in DLL:4), despite previous analyses as a neuter stem (e.g. Laroche 1979c:72, Starke 1990a:183).

[O.B.]

1.3.5Derivatives

  1. arawa-
  2. arus-

1.4 Hittite

āra

‘right’

1.4.1Literature / Comments

HW 2nd ed. A:219-221

2. Reconstruction

2.1Reconstruction ‘what is right/due’

With the comparative material adduced here, we may posit a noun in *-eh2- continued in Lyc. A ara- c. ‘rite’ with an additional frozen (or adverbial) case for Hitt. āra ‘right’ and HLuw. /ara/ ‘id.’, i.e. PAnat. *áreh2- ‘what is right, what is due’ (HED A:120), likely built on a thematic adjective *ar-o- (as in Rieken & Sasseville 2014a:304 and see the link to PAnat. *ar-ó- below ). In LIV²:269f., the root is reconstructed as *h2er-, although it is specified that if Hitt. āra belongs to this root, *(h1)ar- would have to be posited (the latter is preferred by Rieken & Sasseville 2014a:304f. with n. 5, LIPP II:288, Eichner 2016a:65 n. 45 “PIE *ar-”; cf. Hajnal 1994a:144 and Martínez Rodríguez 2018a:281 “*h1er-eh2- ‘that which comes”For PIE *h1er- ‘to move’; see Luw. /ar-(ti)/). Due to the reluctance of reconstructing a vowel *a for a PIE root, Kloekhorst 2006a:83 posits a PAnat. root *h2or- with o-grade, in which *h2 is lost before *o. Contra Kloekhorst (EDHIL:198f.), Lyc. A erawazije- does not belong to this root, which eliminates the synchronic argument for reconstructing an o-grade. Moreover, if the sound law adduced by the Leiden scholar were correct, we would expect to find traces of the retention as ḫar- beside ar-, as it happens with the root *h3er- (Anat. ḫar- beside ar-); see under PAnat. *h3ór‑/*h3r̥‑´.

For the connection with the Indo-European root *ar- as found in Gk. ἄραρε ‘to be fitted’ and Skt. áram ‘fitting, right, proper’, see HEG A-H:50, HED A:120f. and EDHIL:198f. all with further literature. However, it is important to point out that Melchert 1999a has tried to adduce certain derivatives such as CLuw. *arla(/i)- and CLuw. aranuwa-(i) as well as Lyd. arwo-(d) and alarm- to a PIE root of possession as in Lat. rēs ‘property’ and Skt. rāi-/rayi- ‘wealth’, which deserves further investigation; see also under the relevant lemmata.

One should also compare the deradical formation PAnat. *ar-ó- ‘companion’, involving Car. eri, which is taken as the true derivational base of Hitt. arāwa- and Lyc. A arawa- following Rieken & Sasseville 2014a:304 and Eichner 2016a:65; see also under the factitive verb PAnat. *arou̯eh2-.

[D.S.]

3. Proto-Indo-European

3.1Semantic Reconstruction

The root is mostly attested through nominal derivatives that have a broad variety of meanings, all of which, however, can be traced back in one way or another to a verbal meaning ‘to join, fit together’ (cf. LIV²:269–270 s.v. 1.h2er- “sich (zusammen)fügen”), as attested in the verbs Gk. ἀραρίσκω, aor. ἤραρον, ἦρσα, perf. ἄρηρα, Ved. sám aranta, r̥ṇóṣ, and (with semantic specialization) in Arm. aṙnem ‘I make’, arari ‘I made’ and YAv. arā̊ṇte ‘they get stuck’. The semantic development ‘to join, fit together’ > ‘what fits, what is right’ is not uncommon: compare *dem(h2)- ‘to put together’ (Gk. δέμω ‘I build’) and PGmc. *temana- ‘to fit’ (Goth. ga-timan ‘to match’, Germ. ziemen ‘to be appropriate’).

3.2Morphological Reconstruction

The precise reconstruction of the root under question is debated (see above under PAnat. Reconstruction). Hitt. āra ‘right’ and HLuw. /ara/ ‘id.’ speak decisively in favor of *h1ar- unless one accepts Kloekhorst’s claim (e.g., in Kloekhorst 2006a:83) that *h2- is regularly lost before *o and reconstructs an o-grade formation *h2oreh2- vel sim. The only other way to decide whether the root is *h2er- or *h1ar- would be the existence of a zero grade ἐρ- in Greek, which (qua the expected outcome of *h1r̥- or *h1r-) would tip the scales in favor of the latter. Yet, even though the two prefixes ἀρι- and ἐρι- that both mean ‘very, good, high(ly)’ (as in ἀρί-γνωτος ‘easy to be known’ or ἐρι-σθενής ‘very mighty’) could be seen as the avatars of *h1ari- and *h1ri-, respectively, such an analysis is not very attractive – apart from the questionable semantics, the two FCMs behave quite differently (ἀρι-° in verbal governing compounds, ἐρι-° in bahuvrīhis) and ἐρι-° (that more often than not means ‘high’) is more readily connected with Hittite šēr ‘above, up’ (with psilosis; see EDG:130 s.v. ἀρί- with references). Alternatively, ἐρι-° ‘high’ might belong with Hitt./CLuw. aru- ‘high’ (Melchert 2009d:618f. n. 15), though the root of the latter is more likely the ‘rise’ root *h3er- (see under CLuw. aru-), which makes a connection with Gk. ἐρι-° virtually impossible. If Greek ἄρα ‘of course, then, so’ belongs to our root at all (see, e.g., EDG:121 s.v. ἄρα; LIPP II:289), the alleged Cyprian variant ἔρ(α) (extracted from certain glosses in Hesychius) could point to *h1r-a, though there are good arguments to rather discard it (see LIPP II:289 n. 9). Apart from these forms, I do not know of any solid evidence for a zero-grade Greek ἐρ- attributable to this root.The remaining potentially relevant evidence listed in LIPP II:288–293 (including Phrygian ερα ‘then’) is too doubtful to draw any definite conclusions from it. According to Pinault (apud Massetti 2020a:4 note 13), there were two separate roots in PIE, namely *h2er- ‘to join together’ and *h1ar- ‘to fit, suit’, though it is not clear what evidence this is based on.

Formally, the adjective PAnat. *aro- ‘right’ (see above under PAnat. Reconstruction) could either be seen as a full-grade thematic adjective *h1ar-ó- (comparable with *kelh1-ó- ‘going round and round’ > OIcel. hvel n. ‘wheel’, OPruss. kelan ‘id.’) or an o-grade thematic adjective *h2or-ó- (cf. *tomh1-ó- > Gk. τομός ‘cutting, sharp’), for either of which a meaning ‘what is fitted, what fits’ can easily be assumed (see Nussbaum 2017a). At least the former reconstruction, viz. *h1ar-ó-, may also account for the FCM of Ved. ará-mati- f. ‘a righteous mind; deity of the righteous mind’ = Av. ārmaiti- f. (< *arə-maiti-) ‘a righteous mind; deity of the righteous mind’, and Ved. ará-maṇas- ‘ready to serve, obedient’ (*‘with a mind that is *ará-’).

[S.H.]

4. Transmission

Ved. sám aranta ‘they joined, fit together’ (RV), r̥ṇóṣ 2sg. inj. ‘you fit’, ará- m. ‘spoke’ (RV+), áram ‘readily, suitably’ (RV+), r̥tá- ‘proper, right, true’, n. ‘truth’ (RV+), r̥tú- m. ‘right, settled time, fit season’ (RV+), ará-mati- f. ‘a righteous mind; deity of the righteous mind’ (RV+), etc.Cf., e.g., IEW:55–61; LIV²:269–270 s.v. 1.h2er-; EWAia I:107 s.v. ará-, I:109–110 s.v. áram, I:254–255 s.v. r̥tá-, I:257 s.v. r̥tú-, I:110 s.v. arámati-; Werba 1997a:166

YAv. arā̊ṇte ‘they get stuck’, OAv. arə̄m, YAv. arəm ‘proper, fitting’, OAv., YAv. aṣ̌a- n. ‘truth’ (°-arəta-, °-ərəta-, OPers. arta-° in compounds), Av. ratu- m. ‘time period; allotment’, ārmaiti- f. (< *arə-maiti-) ‘a righteous mind; deity of the righteous mind’, etc.Cf., e.g., IEW:55–61; LIV²:269–270 s.v. 1.h2er-; EWAia I:109–110 s.v. arám, I:254–255 s.v. r̥tá-, I:257 s.v. r̥tú-, I:110 s.v. arámati-

Gk. ἄρμενος ‘fitting’, ἀραρίσκω ‘join, fit together’, aor. ἤραρον, ἦρσα, perf. ἄρηρα (Il.+), part. perf. ἀρᾱρώς, ἀρηρώς, fem. ἀρηρυῖα, ἀρᾰρυῖα, Myc. a-ra-ru-wo-a /ararwoha/ n. pl., a-ra-ru-ja /araruja(i)/, Gk. χαλκο-άρᾱς ‘bronze-armed’ (Pi.), χαλκήρης, -ες ‘fitted, armed with bronze’ (Il.+), Myc. ka-ka-re-a /khalkāreha/ ‘equipped with bronze’, Gk. δάμαρ, -αρτος f. ‘wife, spouse’ (Il.+), πυλ-άρτης ‘gate-fastener’ (cf. πύλας … εὖ ἀραρυίας Il. 7.339), ἀρθμός m. ‘bond, league, friendship’ (h.Merc., A., etc.), ἅρμα n. (frequ. in pl.) ‘(war-)chariot’ (Il.+), Myc. a-mo, pl. a-mo-ta ‘wheel’, Gk. ἄρα ‘of course, then, so’, ἀρτύω ‘arrange, prepare, make ready’ (Il.+), ἁμ-αρτή adv. ‘together, at the same time’ (Hom., Sol., E.), ἀρετή f. ‘goodness, excellence’, etc.Cf., e.g., IEW:55–61; LIV²:269–270 s.v. 1.h2er-; GEW I:128–129 s.v. ἀραρίσκω, I:142–143 s.v. ἅρμα, DELG:101–102 s.v. ἀραρίσκω, 110–111 s.v. ἅρμα, EDG:123 s.v. ἀραρίσκω, 133–134 s.v. ἅρμα, DMic I:57–58 s.v. a-mo, I:95–96 s.v. a-ra-ru-ja; I:306 s.v. ka-ka; de Meyer 2022a; Vine 1998a:51f.; Massetti 2013-2014a

Lat. artus ‘close, strict’ (Enn./Plaut.+), adv. artē ‘closely, firmly’ (Naev.+; cf. Gk. ἁμαρτή); ars, -tis f. ‘art, skill’ (Plaut.+), in-ers ‘unskilled, inactive’ (Naev.+), soll-ers ‘skillful, ingenious’ (Ter./Cato+), artiō, -ire ‘to insert tightly, wedge’ (Cato+), artō, -āre ‘to fix firmly’ (Plaut.+), artus, -ūs m. ‘joint, limb’ (Enn.+), arma, -ōrum n.pl. ‘armor, arms’ (Plaut.+), etc.Cf., e.g., IEW:55–61; WH I:70 s.v. ars, s.v. 1. artus, s.v. 2. artus, 67 s.v. arma; EDLIL:55 s.v. ars, 55–56 s.v. artus, 56 s.v. artus, 54 s.v. arma

Arm. aṙnem ‘I make’, arari ‘I made’, ard (u-stem) ‘shape, order’, ardar ‘righteous’, z-ard ‘ornament’, ard ‘right now’ (cf. Gk. ἄρτι ‘just now’).Cf., e.g., IEW:55–61; Klingenschmitt 1982a:162–3, Olsen 1999a:107, EDAIL:112 s.v. aṙnem, 134–5 s.v. ard

PGmc. *ardiz ‘character, nature, quality’ > MHG art, Germ. Art, ON ein-arðr ‘single; firm, determined’, OE eard ‘land, home; condition, state’.Cf., e.g., IEW:55–61; de Vries 1977a:96–97 s.v. einarðr, 12 s.v. arðr 2

Lith. artùs ‘near’, adv. artì ‘close’, prep. ‘close to’, ar̃tis m. ‘vicinity’, etc.Cf., e.g., ALEW I:52–53 s.v. artùs

Toch. B arwāre ‘ready’, ārwer indecl. ‘ready’, Toch. A ārwar ‘id.’, B ārt(t)(ā)-, A ārt(ā)- ‘approve of, love, praise’ (pres. 3sg. B orttotär, A artär).Cf., e.g., IEW:55–61; Adams 1999a s.v. arwāre, s.v. ārwer, s.v. ārtt-, Malzahn 2010a:528–530

Cross-references