*bhórh2-/bhr̥h2

‘to chase’

Language
Proto-Anatolian
Grammar
verb
ID
3668

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Hieroglyphic Luwian

/parh(a)-/, (PES2)FUGARE+RA/I-

‘to drive’

1.1.1Transmission

This lexeme is attested four times in inscriptions from Cilicia and the Amuq, dating maximally from the 9th to the early 7th century BCE.

[A.P.]

1.1.2Forms

1sg. pret. act. /parh(a)hha/ (PES2)FUGARE+RA/I-ha TELL TAYINAT 2, line 1: 6 (Amuq)
    FUGARE-ha-há KARATEPE 1 (Ho.), §13 (Cilicia)
    FUGARE-ha JISR EL HADID frag. 3, §c (Amuq)
    ˹FUGARE˺[...]-há KARATEPE 1 (Hu.), §13 (Cilicia)

[A.P.]

1.1.3Graphic Features

1.1.3.1Phonological Interpretation

The phonological interpretation for this word was suggested by Melchert 2016a:202, who connected it to CLuw. parḫaddu ‘he must chase’And not CLuw. par(a)- as previously envisaged by scholars (see e.g. CLL:167); cf. also Sasseville 2021a:269. and thus also to Hittite parḫ- ‘to chase, drive’.

The use of for a logographic determinative shows that the word belongs to the motion verbs. Other verbs using the same logogram are e.g. HLuw. /ar-(ti)/ ‘to move, come’, HLuw. /awi-(di)/ ‘to come’, HLuw. /hwiya-(i)/ ‘to run’ and several more. The other logogram, now understood as (*501), was for a long time uninterpretable to scholars, because it only occurs with the present lexeme, see Hawkins 2000a:24.

[AH.B.]

1.1.4Meaning

A general sense of the verb became clear to Bossert 1949a:103 (“herauswerfen”) in the context of the KARATEPE 1 bilingual inscription, although the Phoenician version of the clause was somewhat opaque due to the rare verb Phoenician trq ‘to remove, extirpate, root out’ (cf. Hawkins 2000a:50, 60, cf. also Krahmalkov 2001a:212). All other contexts of attestation are either too broken or otherwise too unclear for a semantic assessment, and only the connection with CLuw. parḫ(a)- ‘to drive’ facilitated a better understanding. At KARATEPE 1 (Ho.), §13, the clause runs: wa/i-ta (“TERRA”)ta-sà-kwa/i+ra/i-ri+i ARHA FUGARE-ha-há, approx. /wa=ada=tta taskwaradi ahha parh(a)Ha/, translating as ‘(Which evils were in the land,) I drove them from the land’ (cf. Hawkins 2000a:50).

[AH.B.]

1.1.5Stem

Based on the attestations, it cannot be said with confidence which stem class the verb belongs to, as /-a-(ti)/ or /-a(i)-(di)/ are possible (cf. Sasseville 2021a:19-21, 80-82), alongside a root verb of the ḫi-conjugation, which appears most likely; see the CLuw. cognate and under Reconstruction.

[AH.B.]

1.2 Cuneiform Luwian

parḫ(a)-

‘to drive, chase’

1.2.1Transmission

The sole attestation of the verb comes from a song incipit in the Ištanuwa festival.

[E.R.]

1.2.2Forms

3sg. impv. act. pár-ḫa-ad-du KUB 25.39 iv 10 (CTH 773, NS)

1.2.3Graphic Features

Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv.

[E.R.]

1.2.4Meaning

The verb is found in a song incipit: (9)pa-a-ta a-ú-i-du za-ar!-ni-ia (10)pár-ḫa-ad-du na-im-ma-an-za KI.MIN “and let him come parḫ(a)- it, the (re)turned, to the zarniya, ditto” (broadly following Sasseville 2021a:408; different HEG W-Z:673). In spite of the obscure context, the equation with Hitt. parḫ- ‘to drive, chase’ and Hieroglyphic Luwian verb ARHA *501-ha-// ARHA *501+RA/I- ‘to drive, chase away’ proposed by Melchert 2016a:205 permits a semantic interpretation of the verb as ‘to drive, chase’. It finds some support by its co-occurrence with nai-/niya-(i) ‘to turn’, another transfer verb.

Outdated is the previous identification with CLuw. para-(ti) ‘to carry (off)’, under the assumption that -ḫ- is lost without trace (Čop 1965a:101, followed in HEG P:452, HED PA:120, EDHIL:634, with more caution also in CLL:167, HHw:122).

[E.R.]

1.2.5Stem

The stem class of the form pár-ḫa-ad-du cannot be securely identified, since °a-ad-du following the root occurs in root verbs of the ḫi-conjugation (with a theme vowel) and the -a-(ti) factitives alike. Accordingly,Melchert 2016a:206 cites the verb as parḫ(a)-, thus implicitly noting the ambiguity.

[E.R.]

1.3 Luwian (Glossenkeilwörter)

Glossenkeilparḫanzi

‘(not a GKW)’

1.3.1Transmission

The alleged occurrence of the verb parḫ- with a gloss wedge is found in the horse training text of Kikkuli (CTH 284, NS), i.e. 3pl. pres. act. Glossenkeilpár-ḫa-an-zi (KBo 3.2 rev.! 58). – Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv – CHD P:96 classifies the gloss wedge between panzawartanna and parḫanzi plausibly as a punctuation marker. In fact, the position of the wedge is curious insofar as it occurs immediately after panzawartanna without any space intervening, suggesting that it belongs to that word instead of the following parḫanzi, which it is separated from by a space. Therefore, parḫ- does not count as a gloss wedge word.

[E.R.]

1.4 Hittite

parḫa-/parḫ-(ḫi)

‘to drive, chase’

1.4.1Literature / Comments

CHD P:143-147

2. Reconstruction

2.1Reconstruction ‘to chase’

The CLuw. verb parḫaddu is more likely to reflect a ḫi-conjugated verb with a theme vowel (thus matching Hitt. parḫa-/parḫ-(ḫi)) than a mi-conjugated one (which would match Hitt. parḫ-(mi)). Therefore, with all due caution, we reconstruct a Proto-Anatolian root verb of ḫi-conjugation *bhórh2-/bhr̥h2 ‘to chase’ (pace EDHIL:634f., who assumes the ḫi-conjugated verb to be secondary). The shape of the root has been reconstructed as such on account of the comparative evidence with Indo-Iranian (see below), thus Oettinger 1979a:213f., Yoshida 2007aEDHIL:634f., Melchert 2016a:206, contra HED PA:121 and for a summary of various suggested etymologies, see HEG P:453f. The root-final *h2 instead of *h3 is supported by the Hittite spellings such as pár-aḫ-ḫa-a-i, in which the scribes attempts to express the voiceless quality of the laryngeal.The morphological comparison between Hitt. parḫanna-/-i(ya)-(ḫi) and Ved. bhuraṇyáti is outdated; see Sasseville 2021a:526, pace Oettinger 1992a:236.

On the retention of the root-final laryngeal in the medio-passive parḫattari, see Yoshida 2007a.

[D.S.]

3. Proto-Indo-European

3.1Semantic Reconstruction

The basic meaning of the root *bherh2- is reconstructed as ‘to move quickly’ in LIV²:81 s.v. *bherh2- (“sich schnell bewegen”). In Hittite, this meaning may be reflected in a couple of intransitive instances of the verb parḫ-(mi), parḫa-/parḫ-(ḫi) in which it means ‘to hasten, hurry, race’ (see CHD P:146 meaning 5). The predominant transitive meaning ‘to drive, chase’ in Hittite and Luwian would then have to be interpreted as originating in a quasi-causative ‘to make someone move quickly’. However, root verbs based on intransitive root semantics only rarely develop causative meanings. The other direction is more frequent, namely that (active) verbs function both as a transitive and as their own oppositional anticausative (discussed, e.g., by Kulikov 2012a:27 et passim; Malzahn 2014c:97–100). This causative alternation is attested for a number of thematic presents (*-e/o- and *-i̯e/o-) in the Indo-European daughter languages (cf., e.g., Vedic ríṣyati ‘injures; is injured’) and can be projected for root presents as well (see Höfler 2023a:110). Accordingly, it might be preferable to reconstruct the meaning of *bherh2- as a transitive ‘to chase, rush, hurry somebody’ (thus Oettinger 2020b). The root present *bhérh2-ti then meant ‘chases, rushes, hurries (somebody)’ (reflected in Hittite parḫzi ‘drives, chases (somebody)’), but could also serve as its own intransitive anticausative ‘chases (around), rushes, hurries’ (reflected in Hittite parḫ- (intr.) ‘to hasten, hurry’ and in Indo-Iranian, even if these do not continue the root present). This also aligns with Oettinger 2020b who shows that the meaning ‘to move back and forth quickly, to rush, to bustle, to shake’ assigned to Vedic bhari (and by extension to Proto-Indo-European *bherh2-) does not really account for the Rigvedic passages and argues for a meaning ‘to stamp, stomp’ (< ‘chase, rush’) instead.

[S.H.]

4. Transmission

Hittite parḫ-(mi), parḫa-/parḫ-(ḫi) ‘to drive, chase, make gallop; (intr.) to hasten’, Cuneiform Luwian parḫ(a)- ‘to drive, chase’, Hieroglyphic Luwian /parh(a)-/ ‘to drive’.See above and EDHIL:634f. s.v. parḫ-(zi).

Vedic bhari ‘to move back and forth quickly, to rush, to bustle, to shake’ or ‘to stamp, stomp’as per Oettinger 2020b (e.g., bhurántu ‘let them clatter’ RV 10.76.6, etc.), intens. járbhurīti ‘moves quickly, rushes along, flickers’ (RV), bhū́rṇi- ‘restless, active, excited, wild’ (RV). Cf., e.g., EWAia II:250 s.v. BHARI, Werba 1997a:308 s.v. *bhṝ, LIV²:81 s.v. *bherh2-.

(?) Young Avestan barəṇt- ‘storming’. Cf., e.g., EWAia II:250 s.v. BHARI, LIV²:81 s.v. *bherh2-. See EDIV:10 s.v. *bharH for more potential but doubtful evidence from other Iranian languages.

(?) Latin furō, -ere ‘to rave, rage, or seethe’ (Enn.+), furia, -ae f. ‘fury, rage’ (Enn.+), furor, -ōris m. ‘violent madness’ (Lucr.+).Seen as a cognate by, e.g., LIV²:81 s.v. *bherh2-; agnostic EDLIL:252 s.v. furō; subsumed with ferveō, fervō ‘be hot, burn, boil’ under a root *bheru̯- ‘to boil, to surge’ by Kölligan 2020b.

Cross-references

Articles referring here