u-(d)

‘to write’

Language
Lydian
Grammar
verb
ID
1551

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Lydian

u-(d)

‘to write’

1.1.1Transmission

This lexeme is found in various inscriptions, both metrical and non-metrical. It is attested in a graffito from Egypt datable to around 600 BCE, and in LW 23, which has recently been dated to 542-41 BCE (Euler & Sasseville 2019a:134).

[D.S.]

1.1.2Forms

3sg. pres. act. ẽnud LW 10.9 (Sardis)  
  ẽṇud LW 23.21 (Sardis)  
3sg. pret. act. ul LW 13.6 (Sardis)  
    LW 49.2 (Egypt)  
  katul LW 10.7 (Sardis)  

For the forms attributed to the paradigm established here, see Sasseville 2021a:312f. Pace Gusmani 1964a:217, the words uwed and belong to different lexemes.

[D.S.]

1.1.3Meaning

Meriggi 1935a:105 suggests the meaning ‘to write’ based on the context of LW 49, which alone would be hardly convincing. However, Heubeck 1959a:66 demonstrates that the meaning is contextually adequate also for the other cases, i.e. with the preverbs ẽn-, i.e. ẽnud, and kat-, i.e. katul (followed by Gusmani 1964a:108, 217-219, Gusmani 1980a:64, Yakubovich 2005b:77 n. 12, Sasseville 2021a:312f.). The meaning is accepted for ẽnud in LW 23 by Dusinberre 2003a:230 and Bouzid-Adler 2014a:14 (though in both cases wrongly translated as 1sg. pret.), and by Euler & Sasseville 2019a:132f. Whereas the simplex verb u-(d) is used transitively, the compound verbs ẽn-u-(d) and probably kat-u-(d) are used intransitively (see Euler & Sasseville 2019a:132f., Sasseville 2021a:313).

[D.S.]

1.1.4Stem

The verb u-(d) is treated as a root verb of the lenited mi-conjugation (Sasseville 2021a:312f.).

[D.S.]

2. Reconstruction

2.1Reconstruction

Despite several attempts, no plausible etymologically has so far been  suggested for Lyd. u-(d) ‘to write’ (cf. Gusmani 1964a:219 with further literature, and Yakubovich 2005b:77 n. 12 against the connection with HLuw. /kwanza-(di)/ ‘to incise’). Considering the shape of the root, it is likely that an initial consonant has disappeared and that the root ended with a diphthong, which would explain its lenited mi-conjugation. Therefore, a connection with the PIE root *g̑heu̯- ‘to pour’ is the most straightforward reconstruction, i.e. *g̑héu̯-/g̑hu-´ ‘to pour (words)’ > ‘to write’. The root is also found in Hittite kutta- ‘wall’ (< *g̑heu̯- + -t-) (see Rieken 1999a:136f. and HEG I-K:676f., HED K:297, EDHIL:499).

[D.S.]

3. Proto-Indo-European

3.1Semantic Reconstruction

PIE *g̑heu̯- means primarily ‘to pour’ (cf. LIV²:179), secondarily also ‘to pour a libation’ (in religious contexts) and ‘to heap sth. up (e.g. earth)’. For the latter meaning, cf. ModHG schütten ‘to pour’ alongside auf-schütten ‘to heap up’. Whether Lyd. u-(d) ‘to write’ comes from *‘to pour words’ is doubtful, however. Usually, ‘to pour words’ (e.g. Lat. verba fundere) is a (poetic) expression for ‘to let words be heard’ rather than ‘to write words’.

3.2Morphological Reconstruction

As for the verbal stems formed to PIE *g̑heu̯- ‘to pour (a libation); to heap up’, a root aorist *g̑héu̯-/*g̑hu-´ can be reconstructed on the basis of Gk. ep. ἔχυτο aor. midd. ‘streamed’ (LIV²:179) and perhaps also Lyd. u-(d) ‘to write’ (but see the concerns sub Semantic Reconstruction above). The reduplicated present *g̑hi-g̑héu̯-/*g̑hi-g̑hu-´ (→ Ved. juhó-ti) and the thematic present *g̑héu̯-e/o- (> Gk. χέω) are both limited to a single language. For further verbal formations, cf. LIV²:179. A nominal stem attested in several languages is, e.g., the verbal adjective *g̑hu-tó- (Gk. χυτός in Hom. χυτὴ γαῖα ‘heaped-up earth’, Ved. hutá- adj. ‘sb. to whom is sacrificed’, PGerm. *ǥuđa- n. ‘god’ > OS god, OHG got, etc.,< pre-PGerm. *g̑hu-tó-m; for the semantics, cf., e.g., Lühr 2000a:304, Watkins 2011a:31b s.v. gheu- in the attached language-and-culture note, Jackson & Oettinger 2014a.TochA ñäkt, TochB ñakte ‘god’< PToch. *njä-kätæ- < pre-PToch. *ni-g̑hu-tó-m, as per Hackstein 2006a:100–103, Hackstein 2017a:1312.). Furthermore, cf. Ved. hóman- n. ‘libation, sacrificial pouring, sacrifice’, Gk. χεῦμα n. ‘that which is poured, stream, etc.’ < PIE *g̑héu̯-men- n. and Ved. ā́-huti- f. ‘libation, sacrifice’, Av. ā-zūiti- f. ‘clarified butter, sacrificial fat’, Gk. χύσις f. ‘shedding, pouring out/forth; heap; etc.’ < PIE *g̑hu-ti- f. Noteworthy is also the t-stem noun Hitt. kū̆tt(a)- c. ‘wall’ < PIE *g̑héu̯‑t‑/*g̑hu-t-´ vel sim. ‘what is heaped up’ (Germ. Aufschüttung); cf. EDHIL:498f., Rieken 1999a:136f. – Alongside PIE *g̑heu̯- ‘to pour’ there is an extended root variant *g̑heu̯d- ‘id.’ (LIV²:179f.), with reflexes in Italic and Germanic – cf., e.g., Lat. fundere pres. ‘to pour’ ← nasal-infix pres. *g̑hu-né-d-/*g̑hu-n-d-´ and PGerm. *ǥeu̯te/a- ‘to pour’ (Goth. giutan, OHG giozan, etc.) < pre-PGerm. *g̑héu̯d-e/o-; cf. for both LIV²:179f. For further derivatives of PIE *g̑heu̯(d)-, cf. the transmission above and IEW:447f.

[T.S.]

4. Transmission

Ved. juhó-ti pres. ‘to pour; to sacrifice’ (RV+), hutá- adj. ‘sb. to whom is sacrificed’ (RV [6.50.15]+), hótar- m. ‘chief priest, sacrificer’ (RV+), hótrā- f. ‘libation, sacrifice’ (RV+), hótra- n. ‘act of sacrificing, priesthood’ (RV+), hóman- n. ‘libation, sacrificial pouring, sacrifice’ (RV), ā́-huti- f. ‘libation, sacrifice’ (RV+); OAv. zaotar- m. ‘priest’, YAv. zaoϑrā- f. ‘libation’, YAv. zaoϑra- n. ‘libation, priesthood’, Av. ā-zūiti- f. ‘clarified butter, sacrificial fat’Cf., e.g., EWAia II:808f. s.v. HAV, 821 s.v. hótar- and hótrā-, 822 s.v. hóman-, LIV²:179.

Gk. χέω pres. ‘to pour’, ep. ἔχυτο aor. midd. ‘streamed’, etc.; χυτός adj. ‘heaped up’ (Hom. only χυτὴ γαῖα), χεῦμα n. ‘that which is poured, stream, etc.’ (ep. Ion. poet., Il. 23.561+), χύσις f. ‘shedding, pouring out/forth; heap; etc.’ (Od.+)Cf., e.g., GEW II:1090–1093, LIV²:179, EDG:1627–1629.

Arm. joyl (o-stem) sbst. ‘a molten mass; weight’, adj. ‘molten, massive’, jew sbst. (o-stem) ‘form, shape, fashion’Cf., e.g., Olsen 1999a:36 s.v. E. joyl, 47 s.v. G. jew, EDAIL:432f. s.v. jew, 438 s.v. joyl.

Lat. fundere,  pres. ‘to pour, let go, emit’ (Plaut.+), fūtis, -is sbst. ‘water-vessel’ (Varro), etc.; (?)Umbr. hondu 3sg. impv. II ‘he shall strike down!’Cf., e.g., Untermann 2000a:331f., EDLIL:249f.

Goth. giutan vb. ‘to pour’, ON gjóta vb. ‘id.’, OE gēotan vb. ‘to pour, flow’, OHG giozan vb. ‘to pour’, etc.; ON gjósa vb. ‘to gush (out/forth); Goth. guþ m. ‘god’, ON goð m./n. ‘id.’, OE god m. ‘id.’, OS god m. ‘id.’, OHG got m. ‘id.’, etc.Cf., e.g., Lühr 2000a:304f. s.v. goð, EWAhd IV:357–360 s.v. giozan, 534–537 s.v. got, EDPG:177 s.v. *geutan-, 193f. s.v. *guda-.

TochAB ku- ‘to pour, offer a libation’, cf. TochB pres. VIII kuṣän-ne, TochA pret. III śosā‑ṃ, etc.; TochB ñakte, TochA ñäkt sbst. ‘god’; TochB eñcuwo sbst. ‘iron’Cf., e.g., Malzahn 2010a:596–598 s.v. ku-, DTB²:190f. s.v. ku-, 281f. s.v. ñakte, Hackstein 2017a:1312 (for TochB ñakte, TochA ñäkt), 1323 (for TochAB ku-), Hackstein 2006a:100–103 (for TochB ñakte, TochA ñäkt), Hackstein, Habata & Bross 2019a:208f. with lit. (for TochB eñcuwo).

Cross-references