*h3orbh-ó-
‘heap’
- Language
- Proto-Anatolian
- Grammar
- subst
- ID
- 3578
1. Individual Anatolian Languages
1.1 Hieroglyphic Luwian
*/harb(i)-/
‘heap’1.1.1Derivatives
1.2 Luwian (Glossenkeilwörter)
ḫarp(i)-
1.2.1Transmission
The word, with Luwian features, occurs in cult inventories, festival texts, rituals, letters and oracle reports (from OS onwards). Besides that, the texts attest to many forms that may also belong to the related genuinely Hittite ḫarpā- ‘heap, pile, piling up’ (listed in HW 2nd ed. Ḫ:333-335).
[E.R.]
1.2.2Forms
| acc. sg. | ḫar-pí-in | KUB 50.43, 6’ | (CTH 670, NS) |
| gen. sg. (Hitt.) | ḫar-pí-ia-aš | KUB 5.6 i 21 | (CTH 570, NS) |
| dat./loc. sg. (Hitt.) | IBoT 2.131 rev. 14 | (CTH 528, NS) | |
| ḫar-pí-ia | KUB 25.30 i 13 | (CTH 690, NS) | |
| acc. pl. (Hitt.) | NINDAḫar-pí-uš | FHL 140, 3’ | (CTH 670, NS) |
| gen. adj. nom. sg. c. | ḫar-pa-aš-ši-eš | KBo 24.132 rev. 1 | (CTH 582, NS) |
1.2.3Graphic Features
Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv. – In several cases, determinatives mark the material that the piles are made of.
[E.R.]
1.2.4Meaning
The accepted meaning ‘heap, pile, piling up’ of the Hittite lexeme ḫarpā- (see HW 2nd ed. Ḫ:333-335 and HED H:180f. with references) suits the contexts of the most likely Luwianisms in Hittite context: na-an-kán
ḫar-pí ša mun ša-ra-a pí-ia-an-zi “[they] hand him up onto a pile of salt” (IBoT 2.131 rev. 14f.; Cammarosano 2018a:267f.) and ezen4 ḫar-pa-aš-ši-eš ‘festival of piling up/harvesting’ (cf. Hitt. ezen4 ḫarpaš). The i-stem forms allow two analyses, viz. as a genuine Hittite i-stem besides the a-stem and, alternatively, a Hittite adaptation based on the i-mutated forms of a Luwian corresponding stem ḫarp(i)- (e.g. in ezen4 ḫarpiyaš).There is no reason to postulate an additional stem in -iya-, though formally possible. Since the latter can also go back to Proto-Anatolian thematic noun, the second alternative represents the more economical solution.
[E.R.]
1.2.5Stem
For the stem formation, see under Meaning.
[E.R.]
1.2.6Derivatives
1.2.7Origin
The gloss wedges, the genitival suffix -ašša/i-, and the alternation between a- and i-stem forms point to the existence of a Luwian stem ḫarp(i)-; cf. HW 2nd ed. Ḫ:335 (on ḫarpašša/i-), different DLL:42 and DCL:s.v. (on
ḫar-pí). However, it is very likely that it matches Hittite ḫarpa-, which also provides the base for Hitt. ḫarpā(i)-(mi) ‘to pile up’.
[E.R.]
1.3 Hittite
ḫarpā-
‘heap, pile’1.3.1Literature / Comments
HW 2nd ed. Ḫ:333-335
2. Reconstruction
2.1Reconstruction ‘heap’
The comparison between Hitt. ḫarpā- c. ‘heap’ and CLuw. ḫarp(i)- ‘id.’ leads to the reconstruction of a Proto-Anatolian thematic noun *h3orbh-ó- ‘heap’ (cf. also Hitt. ḫarpali- n. ‘heap, stack’ << *h3(o)rbh-ó-lo- n.). The oxytone accent reconstructed here is based solely on the Hittite plene spelling gen. sg. ḫar-pa-a-aš, which is why it should be taken lightly (on oxytone o-stems in Hittite, see Kimball 2015a). On the other hand, there is also a stem in *-eh2- attested in HLuw. /harba-/ c. ‘rebel (?)’ (< *h3Erbh-eh2-) betrayed by the lack of i-mutation, which is closely associated with CLuw. ḫarpanalla/i- ‘rebel’. Based on the Luwian evidence, there is most likely an n-stem that is not directly attested, but which can be reconstructed from the derivatives listed under lemma below (see also Starke 1990a:232f.). For a potential cognate in Lycian, see Lyc. B xrbblata-, which would confirm a root-final etymological *b(h). Notice however that the Hittite verb ḫarpā(i)-(mi) features a gemination of root-final labial in stem forms, e.g. ḫar-ap-pa-an-zi, on which see Melchert 1994a:153 and EDHIL:372.
Melchert 2010d provides a philological analysis of all Hittite cognates, including especially the medial verb ḫarp- and arguing for the basic meaning ‘to reassociate oneself elsewhere’, from which he derives the various semantics attested. He defends on page 185f. the Indo-European etymological connection with *h3erbh- (followed by EDHIL:311f.), citing the earlier literature.
[D.S.]
3. Proto-Indo-European
3.1Semantic Reconstruction
Traditionally, most of the formations in the table above had been traced back to a stem *orbho- ‘orphaned, orphan’, from which the meanings ‘inheritance’ (< *‘estate of an orphan’), ‘little child; small, little, helpless’ (< *‘orphaned child’), and ‘servant, slave’ (< *‘orphaned, unprotected child (sc. who, in exchange for charity, has to perform all menial tasks)’) were derived (thus IEW:781f. s.v. *orbho-). The discovery of the Anatolian cognates, most notably of the Hittite verb ḫarp-(mi) ‘to separate oneself from someone/something and reassociate oneself elsewhere’ and Luwian ḫarpanalla/i- ‘rebel’, made it more probable, however, that the underlying basis is a verbal root *h3erbh- (perhaps *h2erbh-) with a meaning ‘to change sides, social class, or ownership’ (see Melchert 2010d for a discussion; LIV² Addenda s.v. ?*h3erbh- ‘die Seite wechseln’) or ‘change, undergo transfer, be turned over’ (Weiss 2006b:259). The Anatolian evidence proves that this meaning was already present in the proto-language. Weiss 2006b argues that it, in turn, goes back to an earlier meaning ‘to turn’, still visible in forms such as Latin orbis, -is m. ‘circle, ring, sphere’, Tocharian B yerpe ‘disk, orb’, and perhaps Proto-Germanic *arbaidiz ‘(field) work’ (Gothic arbaiþs, German Arbeit, etc.) if the underlying stem is *arba- ‘turning, cultivation’.
The development from ‘to change sides or ownership’ (or ‘to turn’) to ‘heap, pile’ (as in PAnat. *h3orbh-ó- ‘heap’) is less clear; Melchert 2010d attributes an original meaning *‘association, bringing together’ to the noun (see also EDHIL:312, comparing anda ḫarp- ‘to combine, to join together’).
3.2Morphological Reconstruction
Anatolian is the only branch that preserves a primary verb, though Weiss 2006b:252 and 261 suggests the idea that Latin orbita ‘rut, track left by a wheel’ and Umbrian urfeta (an object that the ministrant held during a sacrifice) are nominalizations of a participial form of an old iterative verb *h3orbh-éi̯e/o- ‘roll like a wheel (vel sim.)’.
The nominal formations can be traced back to a τόμος-type verbal noun *h3órbh-o- ‘who or what is turned over’ (> ‘orphan’, ‘slave’, and ‘inheritance’) and an internally derived τομός-type adjectiveon these types see Nussbaum 2017a ‘who has the inheritance’ > ‘heir’ (see Weiss 2006b:259 and 268). As these formations, as well as the potential iterative *h3orbh-éi̯e/o-, are expected to appear in o-grade, we cannot rule out that the root is actually *h2orbh- (see Weiss 2006b:259 note 43).
[S.H.]
4. Transmission
Hittite ḫarp-(mi) ‘to separate oneself from someone/something and reassociate oneself elsewhere’, ḫarpā- c. ‘heap’, ḫarpā(i)-(mi) ‘to heap up’, ḫarpali- n. ‘heap, stack’, Luwian Gloss wedge word
ḫarp(i)- c. ‘heap’, Cuneiform Luwian ḫarpanalla/i- ‘rebel’, Hieroglyphic Luwian /harba-/ c. ‘rebel (?)’See above and Weiss 2006b:254–256; EDHIL:311f. s.v. ḫarp- tta(ri); ḫarp-zi; Melchert 2010d; LIV² Addenda s.v. ?*h3erbh-.
Vedic árbha- ‘small, little’ (RV+)Cf., e.g., EWAia I:119f. s.v. árbha-; the existence of an early Indo-Iranian *órbho- ‘orphan’ is suggested by the loanword Finnish orpo, Estonian orb, Hungarian árva ‘orphan’.
(?) R̥bhú- ‘R̥bhú (Organizer, Divider (of time); Craftsman, Artist)’, r̥bhú- ‘artful, skillful’thus Massetti 2017a with further literature
Ancient Greek ὀρφανός ‘orphan, orphaned; bereaved’ (Od.+)a simple thematic stem *ὀρφος might be at the core of ὀρφοβόται· ἐπίτροποι ὀρφανῶν (Hsch. ο 1361 Latte-Cunningham), ὀρφοβοτία· ἐπιτροπή (Hsch. ο 1362 Latte-Cunningham), and ὤρφωσεν· ὠρφάνισεν (Hsch. ω 388 Hansen-Cunningham). Cf., e.g., GEW II:431 s.v. ὀρφανός, EDG:1113f. s.v. ὀρφανός.
(?) Ὀρφεύς ‘Orpheus’thus Massetti 2017a with further literature
Latin orbus ‘orphaned’ (Pl.+)Cf., e.g., EDLIL:433 s.v. orbus; Weiss 2006b.
(?) orbis, -is m. ‘circle, ring, sphere’ (Cato+)thus Weiss 2006b
Armenian orb ‘orphan’.Cf., e.g., Olsen 1999a:18f. with n. 31, EDAIL:535f. s.v. orb.
(?) arbaneak ‘servant, assistant, successor’a loan from Iranian according to Olsen 1999a:373, 868; EDAIL:129f. s.v. arbaneak argues for an inherited formation.
Old Irish orb(b) o, m. ‘patrimony; heir’, orb(b)e i̯o, n. ‘patrimony, heritage (of land)’, Gaulish PN OrbiusCf., e.g., EDPC:117 s.v. *erb-(y)o-, 299 s.v. *orbo-; Weiss 2006b.
(?) Old Irish erbaid ‘entrusts, commits (sth. to so.), lays (a charge, duty on so.)’from *h3ērbh- according to Weiss 2006b:266f.
Proto-Germanic *arba- m. ‘inheritance’ (Old Norse arfr, Danish arv), *arbija- n. ‘inheritance’ (Gothic arbi, Old Norse erfi, Old English ierfe, Old High German arbi, erbi, German Erbe, Old Frisian erve, English erf), *arbijan- m. ‘heir’ (Gothic arbja, Old Norse arfi, Old English ierfa, Old High German arpeo, erbo, German Erbe)Cf., e.g., de Vries 1977a:12f. s.v. arfi 1, 13 s.v. arfr 1, 103 s.v. erfa, Casaretto 2004a:129, 255f., Kroonen 2013a:33 s.vv. *arbja- and *arbjan-.
(?) Tocharian A and B yerpe ‘disk, orb’Cf., e.g., Adams 1999a:506; Weiss 2006b; borrowed from B into A.
Proto-Slavic *orbŭ ‘servant, slave’ (Old Church Slavonic rabъ, robъ, Russian rab, Czech rob, Serbo-Croatian rȁb, etc.)Cf., e.g., EDSIL:373 s.v. *orbъ; Weiss 2006b:259 note 44.

