papra-(i)
‘to carry (off)’
- Language
- Cuneiform Luwian
- Grammar
- verb
- ID
- 3407
1. Individual Anatolian Languages
1.1 Cuneiform Luwian
papra-(i)
‘to carry (off)’1.1.1Transmission
All attestations of the verb are found in ritual texts from the Kuwattalla tradition (from MS onwards).
[E.R.]
1.1.2Forms
| 3sg. pres. act. | pa-ap-r[a-i] | KUB 35.20 i 8’ | (CTH 761, MS) |
| pa-ap-[ra-i] | KUB 34.62 iii 6’ | (CTH 761, NS) | |
| [pa-ap-ra]-⸢i⸣ | KBo 29.20, 6’ | (CTH 762, NS) | |
| 3sg. impv. act. | pa-ap-ra-ad-du-u(=) | KUB 35.43 ii 12 | (CTH 761, NS) |
| [pa-a]p-ra-ad-du-u(=) | KUB 35.43 iii 24’ | (CTH 761, NS) |
Restorations after Yakubovich & Mouton 2023a.
[E.R.]
1.1.3Graphic Features
Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv.
[E.R.]
1.1.4Meaning
The derivational relationship between para-(ti) at KUB 35.43 ii 10 and reduplicated papra-(i) ibid. ii 12 was noted already in DLL:77 and never called into question. The present interpretation of the semantics as ‘to carry (off)’ follows Melchert 2016a:203-206, who points out that the verb denotes an action by which the sheep removes the evil from the ritual patron. He supports his suggestion with the etymological comparison with PIE *bher- ‘to carry’ (see under Reconstruction). The translation is accepted by Sasseville 2021a:30f., Yakubovich & Mouton 2023a:255, as well as here.The previous translation ‘to chase’ going back to DLL:77 (and accepted in HW:426, CLL:166, HED PA:120, Lehrman 1998a:149, HHw:119, Frotscher 2012a:151, Shevoroshkin 2012a:475) was based on the assonance with Hitt. parḫ- ‘to chase’. It proved to be incompatible with the preservation of -ḫ- in CLuw. parḫ(a)- and HLuw. *501-ha- ‘to chase’ (see Melchert 2016a:205). – Incomprehensible is the interpretation as ‘to announce, curse’ by Starke 1990a:134.
[E.R.]
1.1.5Stem
For the reduplication, see under Meaning. While Sasseville 2021a:31 still assumed that both a factitive stem in papra-(ti) and a ḫi-verb papra-(i) were equally possible, the reading [pa-ap-ra]-⸢i⸣= at KBo 29.20, 6’ with the rest of the upper two horizontal strokes still visible proves the latter to be correct (see also Yakubovich & Mouton 2023a:346).
[E.R.]
For the lemma head see CLuw. par-(ti).

