*en-h2nor-o-

‘having manly strength within’

Language
Proto-Anatolian
Grammar
adj
ID
2756

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Hieroglyphic Luwian

*/annara/i-/

‘strong, virile’

1.1.1Compounds

  1. /annarzuha(/i)-/

1.2 Luwian (Glossenkeilwörter)

doppelter Glossenkeilannara/i-

‘strong, virile’

1.2.1Transmission

Appearing in a letter, a cult inventory, and a festival text, the lexeme shows no preference for a specific genre (from MS onwards).

[E.R.]

1.2.2Forms

nom. sg. an-na-ri-iš KpT 1.39 l. edge r. col. 1 (CTH 527, NS)
acc. sg. an-na-ri-⸢in⸣ KUB 27.13 iv 17’ (CTH 698, NS)
nom./acc. pl. n. doppelter Glossenkeil⸢an⸣-na-ra-a HKM 88, 12’ (CTH 190, MS)

The list of attestations follows Melchert (DCL:s.v.).

[E.R.]

1.2.3Graphic Features

Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv, except for doppelter Glossenkeilan-na-ra-a HKM 88, 12, of which only the handcopy is published.

[E.R.]

1.2.4Meaning

The adjectival function of annara/i- becomes apparent in its use as an attribute of uddār ‘words.’ Accordingly, it must be distinguished from substantival annari- ‘strength, virility’ (also in Hittite transmission). Its parallelism with muwatti(ya)- ‘mighty, powerful’ in ⸢NA4ḫé-gur an-na-ri-inNA4?ḫé?-gur? mu-u-wa-at-ti-in-na “the rock sanctuary ‘Strong’ and the rock sanctuary ‘Powerful’” (KUB 27.13 iv 17’; for the interpretation as names, see Otten & von Soden 1968a:28f.) shows that it does in fact belong  to the same word family as annarumma/i- ‘strong, virile’ (thus already Rosenkranz 1952a:21) and is very close to it semantically. The translation has found broad acceptance (CLL:14, Melchert 1999e:367, EDHIL:387, Simon 2010b:252, Maier 2013a:57; still without translation DLL:26; dismissive HW 2nd ed. A:79).

[E.R.]

1.2.5Stem

The forms in -iš, -in, and show the typical pattern of mutated adjectives.

[E.R.]

1.2.6Derivatives

  1. doppelter Glossenkeilannari-

  2. annarauwar-/-wa-

  3. annarumma/i-

  4. annarumā(i)-

  5. ānnarumāḫi(t)-

1.2.7Origin

The initial vowel quality of annar- vs. Hitt. innar-, the evident i-mutation, and the gloss wedge marking all clearly demonstrate the Luwian origin of the word; cf. the references under Meaning, but different HW 2nd ed. A:79.

[E.R.]

1.3 Lydian

ẽnar(i)-

‘strong (?)’

1.3.1Transmission

This word is found in an inscription dated to the 4th century BCE on paleographic grounds (Gusmani 1975b:12, 53).

[D.S.]

1.3.2Forms

acc. sg. c. ẽnarn LW 80.8 (Sardis)  

1.3.3Meaning

Gusmani 1975b:19 suggests tentatively that ẽnarn constitutes a derivative of Lyd. ẽna- ‘mother’ (thus also Gusmani 1980a:51). Dusinberre 2003a:234 translates it with ‘holy oath’ without further comment, which is incomprehensible. From a comparative perspective with Luwian, Lyd. ẽnar(i)- matches CLuw. annara/i- ‘strong’ (or the noun annar(i)- ‘strength’). An adjective meaning ‘strong’ would make sense, if ẽnarn was taken to agree with fasqν ‘(a deity)(?)’ (see isq(i)-) in the preceding line. Thus, the translation resulting from this approach is adopted here provisionally.

[D.S.]

1.3.4Stem

For the paradigm of Lydian mutated stems, see Sasseville 2017a.

[D.S.]

1.4 Hittite

innarā

‘high-handed (adv.)’

1.4.1Literature / Comments

HW 2nd ed. I:59

2. Reconstruction

2.1Reconstruction ‘having manly strength within’

Equating CLuw. annara/i- ‘strong’ with Lyd. ẽnar(i)- ‘strong (?)’ and Hitt. innarā ‘high-handed (adv.)’, we may reconstruct a thematic adjective in *-o-, i.e. *en-h2nor-o- ‘having a man inside’ in the sense of ‘having manly strength within’ with loss of the *h2 between consonants (cf. Melchert 1994a:50 with further literature, Maier 2013a:57f., EDHIL:387The two OS attestations with single -n- are not probative, contra Kloekhorst ibid., and, therefore, the etymology stands. and Simon 2010b:252). For the Indo-European etymology with *h2ner- ‘man’, see HEG I-K:360f. with further literature. For the Indo-European data, see NIL:332f.

To this adjective, a i-abstract noun has been built in Luwian (in Hitt. Trans.) annari- (Melchert 1999e:367), whereas Hittite may have built a u-stem, *innaru- only preserved in derivatives, although Maier 2013a:57-59 offers a different analysis, working with the possessive suffix -want-. One should also consider simply the suffix -wa- (< *-u̯o-), further derived with -nt- and various other suffixes, as per Rieken & Sasseville 2014a.

Lyc. B sebẽnari is rather to be interpreted as seb(e)=ẽn(e) ari (pace Shevoroshkin 2014a:235 and Schürr 2016d:160); see Lyc.B ar(i)-.

[D.S.]

Cross-references