šaroka-

‘patronage’

Language
Lydian
Grammar
subst
ID
771

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Lydian

šaroka-

‘patronage’

1.1.1Transmission

This lexeme is attested twice in curse formulae belonging to two mutually interconnected inscriptions found in the precinct of Artemis in Sardis and datable to the 5th or 4th century BCE. 

[I.Y.]

1.1.2Forms

acc. sg. šaroka(=) LW 23.12 (Sardis)  
    LW 24.15 (Sardis)  

1.1.3Graphic Features

1.1.3.1Phonological Interpretation

Since both word-final -d and word-final -ν disappear before =k (Gérard 2005a:77), one cannot determine whether the underlying representation of the relevant forms is šaroka(ν)=k or šaroka(d)=k. Consequently, the gender of šaroka- likewise cannot be determined. 

[I.Y.]

1.1.4Meaning

The contexts make it clear that šaroka- refers to the positive attitude of gods, which will be withdrawn from the evildoers. In both instances, šaroka- is coordinated with ẽtwerš(i)- ‘help’ (vel sim.). Consequently, the translation ‘protection’ offered in Melchert 1994a:341 is contextually appropriate. The more precise semantic interpretation of this noun depends on whether one takes it as a derivative of a verbal root šar- ‘to watch’, as does e.g. Melchert 1994a:341 with reference to Melchert 1992a:47, or whether one directly links it with Lyd. šerl(i)- ‘supreme authority’ and ultimately with Hitt. šēr ‘above’. The second solution is hinted at in Maier 2013a:139, but only as an addition to the deverbative derivation. The scrutiny of the Lydian forms containing the morpheme šar- suggests, however, that the assumption of an underlying verbal root is not necessary, since all the relevant verbal forms can be regarded as secondary (cf. under kat-šare-(d), šarloki-). The preference for the second solution is consistent with the proposed translation ‘patronage’.                 

[I.Y.]

1.1.5Stem

Synchronically, we are dealing with an a-stem. The suffix -ok- present in šaroka- cannot be separated from the verbal suffix -ok-, cf. e.g. šarloki-. The retraction of stress on the suffix is consistent with the reduction of the root vowel šer > šar in both cases. As plausibly argued in Melchert 2004b:143, the nominal suffix is cognate with Luw. /ah-id-/ forming abstract nouns, while the verbal suffix is deployed for forming denominatives. A specific parallel for the use of this suffix for the derivation of abstract nouns from local adverbs is Luw. /hantahid-/ (q.v.).

[I.Y.]

For the lemma head see Lyd. *šar-.

Cross-references

Referred to from this article