ḫāriš-

‘lung’

Language
Palaic
Grammar
subst
ID
629

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Palaic

ḫāriš-

‘lung’

1.1.1Transmission

This lexeme is found in a festival text for the Palaic pantheon preserved on Old/Middle and New Hittite tablets.

[D.S.]

1.1.2Forms

stem form ḫa-a-ri-š(=a-at) KUB 35.165 rev. 13’ (CTH 751, OS or MS)
  ḫa-a-ri-š(=a-at) KBo 48.178 iv 11’ (CTH 751, NS)

1.1.3Graphic Features

Checked against the photograph in the Konkordanz (Mainzer Fotoarchiv).

[D.S.]

1.1.4Meaning

The lexeme ḫāriš- occurs in an enumeration of body parts of sacrificial animals to be offered as a meal to the gods (Kammenhuber 1959a:28, Carruba 1970a:56, Eichner 2010a:52). Eichner (ibid.) suggests tentatively the meaning ‘waist’ without further justification. Pal. ḫāriš- n. is surely to be compared with the Hittite word UZUḫaḫriš- n. ‘lung’ (and its extended stem ḫaḫriššar/n-). Only the reduplication in Hittite differs from the Palaic word. Therefore, we assign the meaning ‘lung’ to Pal. ḫāriš- n.

[D.S.]

1.2 Hittite

ḫaḫriš-

‘lung’

1.2.1Literature / Comments

HW (2nd ed.):13, HED Ḫ:7. The form ḫaḫriš=šet (KUB 43.53 i 9’) has been wrongly taken as reflecting a nominative singular common gender ḫaḫri-, which is not supported by the derivative ḫaḫriššar/n- and the Palaic cognate. The dative singular ḫa-aḫ-ri-iš-ši ‘in his lungs’ (KUB 43.34 + KUB 57.105 ii 6’), may underlie the stem ḫaḫriš=ši, in which case the possessive pronoun would be attached to the bare stem or to its nom./acc. sg. form (for this phenomenon in New Hittite see Hoffner & Melchert 2008a:141). In any case, if there was an actual i-stem found in a Hittite sentence, it would not deny the existence of the s-stem but would have to be taken probably as a secondary stem transfer.

[D.S.]

2. Reconstruction

2.1Reconstruction ‘lung’

Comparing Hitt. ḫaḫriš- n. ‘lung’ with Pal. ḫāriš- n. ‘lung’, a Proto-Anatolian substantive *HEr-is- or -e/os- can be reconstructed. The reduplication in Hittite is surely secondary; on nominal reduplication in Hittite see Oettinger 1998b:454. The plene spelling of the root vowel in Palaic could tell us that we are dealing with an accented vowel *ó or with *é colored by *hor *h3. For the Hittite cognate, Puhvel (HED Ḫ:7) and Tischler (HEG A-H:124f.) offer no etymology.

[D.S.]

3. Proto-Indo-European

3.1Semantic Reconstruction

The most prominent source of words for ‘lung’ is the adjectival notion ‘light (in weight)’, cf. PGerm. *lunǥōn- ‘lung’, ModE lights ‘animal’s lung’, etc. (EWAhd V:1512). This semantic development is explained by the fact that the lungs of animals are floating in the cooking pot (because of trapped air) while the other parts of the offal do not. If PAnat. *Haris- ‘animal lung’ is named after this property, it can be derived from PIE *h3er- ‘to begin to move, rise, leap up’ (LIV²:299f., Stüber 2002a:112) as ‘the (organ) risen (and thus floating in the broth)’. The s-stem reconstructed below is morphologically identical to Gk. ὄρος ‘mountain’ which, however, underwent a different semantic specification: PIE *h3Ér-o/es- ‘rising’ > ‘elevation’ (cf. *h1/3Ér-s-o- ‘buttocks’?) > Gk. ὄρος ‘elevation (of the landscape), mountain’. While Greek continues an agent noun (‘elevation’, cf. Stüber 2002a:231–234), Anatolian continues a result noun (‘risen’, cf. Stüber 2002a:234–236).Although there are some languages attesting the derivation of ‘lung’ from ‘chest’ (cf. CLICS² subgraph LUNG, accessed 2019-03-27), such a semantic pathway is less likely. One possibility, however, is a connection with the above-mentioned root PIE *h3er- ‘to begin to move, rise, leap up’ with relation to the rising and lowering of the chest while breathing. Note that PAnat. *Háris- means ‘animal lung’ and animal chests are moving in a different direction while breathing than human ones.

3.2Morphological Reconstruction

The nouns Pal. ḫāriš- n. ‘lung’ and Hitt. ḫaḫriš- n. ‘id.’ can be traced back to a neuter s-stem noun PAnat. *Háris- n. ‘rising (organ)’. This form goes back to either a primary s-stem PIE *h3Ér-o/es- n. ‘elevation’ (cf. Hitt. nepiš- < PIE *nébh-es-) or to an s-stem PIE *h3ér-i-s- derived from an i-stem PIE *h3ór-i-/*h3ér-i- ‘elevation’. Neither the secondary s-stem PIE *h3ér-i-s- nor the i-stem PIE *h3ór-i-/*h3ér-i- have parallels in any non-Anatolian language and are thus less likely as proto-forms. On the contrary, the primary s-stem *h3Ér-o/es- n. ‘elevation’ finds an exact morphological match in Gk. ὄρος ‘mountain’ (< ‘elevation’) which probably continues the derivational base of PIE *h1/3Ér-s-o- ‘buttocks’ (< ‘having elevations’).

[A.O.]

4. Transmission

Gk. ὄρος n. ‘mountain, height’ (Il.+)
GEW I:426, GEW III:164, DELG:825, EDG:1109f., LSJ:1255, LSJSuppl:231

(?)PIE *h1/3Ér-s-o- m. ‘buttocks’,It is not clear whether Hitt. (uzu)arra- c. ‘buttocks, anus’ belongs here or not depending on the reflex of the anlauting laryngeal (cf. EDHIL:75 for one opinion). Furthermore, OIr. err ‘tail, back of a chariot’ shows the reflex of e-grade of the root which contradicts the affiliation to PIE *h3er- ‘to rise’ (LIV²:299f.). However, disconnecting those two lexemes is an option. Therefore, NIL:246–248 reconstructs PIE *h1órs-o- with an ablaut variant *h1ers-eh2- (beside *h1ors-éh2-).cf. Gk. ὄρρος ‘end of the os sacrum, rump’ (GEW I:427, DELG:827, EDG:1110f., LSJ:1256), Arm. oṙ i-st. ‘buttocks’ (EDAIL:531f.), PGerm. *arsa- ‘buttocks’ (EDPG:35)
IEW:340, NIL:246–248, EIEC:88

Cross-references