walpaimann(i)-

‘(a type of pastry)’

Language
Cuneiform Luwian
Grammar
subst, c.
ID
2838

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Cuneiform Luwian

walpaimann(i)-

‘(a type of pastry)’

1.1.1Transmission

The term occurs only in the witaššiya-, ḫuwaššanna- and šaḫḫan- festival texts, which show strong Luwian influence. More than 30 attestations are known from the MH period onward. A representative sample is cited below.

[E.R.]

1.1.2Forms

nom. sg. [NINDAwa-a]l-pa-i-ma-an-ni-iš KUB 27.55 iv 10’ (CTH 692, NS)
  NINDAwa-al-pa-i-ma!-an-ni-iš KUB 12.18, 5 (CTH 694, NS)
  ˹NINDAwa˺-al-pa-i-ma-˹an-ni˺-iš KUB 17.24 ii 20 (CTH 691, NS)
  [NINDAw]a-al-pa-i-m[a-an-ni-iš] KUB 17.24 ii 24 (CTH 691, NS)
  NINDAwa-al-pa-i-ma-an-ni-iš KBo 22.229 ii? 8’ (CTH 694, MS?)
acc. sg. NINDAwa-al-pa-im-ma-a[n-ni-in] KBo 42.16 ii 17’ (CTH 692, NS)
  [NINDAwa-al-pa-i-ma]-an-ni-in KUB 27.61 i 13 (CTH 692, NS)
  NINDAu-wa-al-pa-i[-ma-an-ni-in] KBo 24.28 i 28’ (CTH 692, MS)
dat./loc. sg. [NINDAwa-a]l-pa-i-ma-an-ni KUB 27.49 iv 5 (CTH 692, NS)
unknown [NINDAw]a-al-pa-[i-ma-an-n° KUB 27.60 ii 1’ (CTH 692, NS)
unknown [NINDAwa-a]l-pa-˹i˺-[ma-an-n° KUB 27.66 ii 1’ (CTH 692, LNS)
  NINDAwa-al-pa-[i-ma-an-n° KBo 29.65 iv 2’ (CTH 692, MS?)
  NINDAwa-al-pa-i-m[a-an-n° KBo 29.65 iv 14’ (CTH 692, MS?)
  NINDAwa-al-pa-im-m[a-an-n° KBo 29.172, 11’ (CTH 694, MS?)
  NINDAwa-al-pa-i-m[a-an-n° KBo 24.25 i 5’ (CTH 694, MS?)
  NINDAwa-al-pa-i-im-m[a-an-n° KUB 54.17 ii 6 (CTH 692, NS)
  [NI]NDAwa-al-p[a-i-ma-an-n° KBo 29.87 obv. 14 (CTH 692, MS)
  NINDAwa-al-pa-i-m[a-an-n° KUB 54.10 ii 21’ (CTH 692, NS)
  ˹NINDA˺wa-⟨al⟩-pa-i-im-m[a-an-n° KBo 29.99 ii 8’ (CTH 692, MS)
  NINDAwa-al-˹pa-i˺-i[m-ma-an-n° KBo 24.31 obv.? 7’ (CTH 692, MS)
  ˹NINDA˺wa-al-pa-i-i[m-ma-an-n° KBo 29.183, 8’ (CTH 694, MS)
  NINDAwa-al-pa-i-m[a-an-n° KBo 24.24 ii! 11’ (CTH 693, MS)

1.1.3Graphic Features

Checked against the photographs in the Konkordanz. – The alleged form NINDAwa-al-pa-i-la!-an-ni-iš at KUB 12.18, 5 (thus read by Melchert in DLL:177, followed in CLL:253, HEG W-Z:263) does not exist. The sign features an additional wedge mistakenly imprinted by the scribe, but it is obvious that no LA-sign was intended. – On the erroneous reading NINDAwa-ra-pa-i[a- at KBo 24.24 ii! 11’ (thus Jie 1990a:58 and Ünal 2007a:786f.), see HEG W-Z:262.

The geminate -mm- of the participial suffix is rarely spelled, but frequent enough to be beyond doubt.

[E.R.]

1.1.3.1Phonological Interpretation

Hoffner 1974a:189 suspects a distant assimilation in NINDAwalpailann(i)-, Melchert 1994a:271 considers a distant assimilation to the preceding -l- or a distant dissimilation to the following nasal, and Tischler (HEG W-Z:263) proposes a distant dissimilation or comprehension failure in the course of dictation. None of these suggestions are necessary, because apparent NINDAwalpailann(i)- is a ghostword (see under Graphic Features).

[E.R.]

1.1.4Meaning

Like its derivational base NINDAwalpaimma/i-, the word can be assigned an approximate meaning by way of the determinative ninda for marking names of pastries (DLL:177, Hoffner 1974a:189, CLL:253, HEG W-Z:263). The suffix -ann(i)- is used for deriving diminutives (CLL:253, HEG W-Z:263, Dempsey 2015a:246). Therefore, we are probably dealing with a small wrap or croissant, or the like, which at KBo 24.28 i 28’ is probably said to be made of one upnu of flour or dough (see Hagenbuchner-Dresel 2002a:15).

[E.R.]

1.1.5Stem

The word is derived from the substantivized participle of *walip-, i.e. NINDAwalipaimma/i- (see under Lemma), by means of the diminutive suffix -ann(i)- (see under Meaning). Outdated Hoffner 1974a:189.

[E.R.]

1.1.6Origin

The root, the participial suffix -aimma/i- and the Luwian diminutive suffix -ann(i)- speak for a Luwian origin. Additional evidence supporting this hypothesis comes from the Luwian background of the texts containing the word (since DLL:177).

[E.R.]

For the lemma head, see Luw. *walip-.

Cross-references

Referred to from this article

Articles referring here