šawν
‘toward’
- Language
- Lydian
- Class
- Compound
- Grammar
- adpos
- ID
- 277
1. Individual Anatolian Languages
1.1 Lydian
šawν
‘toward’1.1.1Transmission
The lexeme is attested two times in the Sardian texts dating back to the 5th-4th century BCE, a metrical burial inscription and an official agreement found at the sanctuary of Artemis.
[I.Y.]
1.1.2Forms
| undecl. | šawν | LW 11.3 (Sardis), LW 22.8 (Sardis) |
Both occurrences of the lexeme are adjacent to dative case forms. In the first instance dat. sg wratuλ follows it, in the second case it is squeezed between gen.-dat. pl mλimnaν and gen.-dat. pl sfardẽtaν.
[I.Y.]
1.1.3Meaning
For the earlier attempts to define the meaning of the form under discussion, see Gusmani 1964a:191f., 193. The etymological connection with the root šaw- was seen already in Brandenstein 1931b:41, but the categorial assignment of the forms in question long remained unclear. In particular, the proposal of Brandenstein (loc. cit.:30) to interpret them as acc. sg. c. ‘good’ was based on the unlikely interpretation of šawẽn-. The prerequisite for the proper treatment of šawν was the plausible semantic and etymological analysis of šaw- undertaken in Carruba 1969a:52 and Melchert 1992a:40 respectively.
The analysis of šawν as postposition is offered in Boroday & Yakubovich 2018a on the basis of both distributional and etymological considerations. It is suggested there that Lyd. šawν represents an approximate functional equivalent of its Luwian and Lycian cognates, respectively /tawiyan(ni)/ and ñtewẽ. The meaning ‘toward’ appears to be appropriate for LW 22.8, where the Sardian mλimna- (Mermnads?) appear as counteragents of the Sardians in some sort of property transfer (Yakubovich 2017b). Unfortunately, the other context remains unclear, which makes the semantic analysis of the adposition šawν somewhat tentative.
[I.Y.]
2. Reconstruction
2.1Reconstruction
The parallelism with Luw. /tawiyan(ni)/ and Lyc. ñtewẽ pleads for the analysis of šawν as a compound of the unattested *šaw(V)- ‘eye’ and the adposition ẽn. It is unclear whether Luwian, Lycian, and Lydian adpositions reflect a common archetype of periodical renewals of the same compounding model. In purely formal terms, the easiest scenario would be to assume ẽn was attached to the Pre-Lydian endingless dat.-loc.sg *šaw, before the analogical spread of the pronominal dative-locative ending -λ. For the likely secondary character of the nominal ending -λ, cf. Gérard 2005a:80. The unstressed final syllable was then syncopated, cf. Gérard loc. cit.:49.
[I.Y.]
For the first member of the univerbation see Lyd. *šaw(V)-.

