*Tr̥séh2-

‘shoots’

Language
Proto-Anatolian
Grammar
subst
ID
3852

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Hieroglyphic Luwian

/tarsa-/, tara/i-sa-

‘shoot’

1.1.1Transmission

This hapax is attested in a single inscription from Tabal, dating to c. 740–730 BCE.

[A.P.]

1.1.2Forms

acc. pl. /tarsanzi/ tara/i-sa-zi SULTANHAN, §24 (Tabal)

[A.P.]

1.1.3Graphic Features

1.1.3.1Phonological Interpretation

The phonological interpretation of this word seems clear, since the HLuw. syllabic rendering receives support from the cognate Hittite GIŠtarša- ‘shoots’ (see Hawkins 1986b:98).

[AH.B.]

1.1.4Meaning

The general meaning of this word is clear from the context and denotes growth on a vine. Because of the obvious link with the Hittite collective GIŠtarša- ‘shoots, Germ. Schößlinge, Triebe’This meaning was first suggested by Götze & Sturtevant 1938a:98. recognised by Hawkins 1986b:98, this meaning is usually assumed for the HLuw. word as well, cf. e.g. Melchert 1988a:32 n. 7, HEG T:220f.After first opting for ‘shoots’ as well (Hawkins 1986b:98), Morpurgo Davies & Hawkins 1987a:275 (followed by Hawkins 2000a:466, citing Hoffner 1974a:143) later translate the word with ‘leaves’, which is possible for the HLuw. context of attestation, but produces a less coherent result, since the yields do not increase because of more leaves, but because of additional shoots growing into branches and bearing fruit. SULTANHAN, §24 runs: tara/i-sa-zi-pa-wa/i ia+ra/i-ti-i, approx. /tarsanzi=ba=wa iyaritti/, meaning ‘(The vine grows), it extends the shoots, (and it makes a thousand tiwattalli- measures of wine)’ (cf. Hawkins 2000a:466).

[AH.B.]

1.1.5Stem

The attested form shows the word to be a common gender a-stem. While it is doubtlessly etymologically related to Hittite GIŠtarša- ‘shoots’, the words differ in grammatical gender; cf. e.g. HEG T:221 and see under Reconstruction. The word may be a root cognate of */taru-/ ‘wood’.

[AH.B.]

1.2 Hittite

tarša-

‘shoots’

1.2.1Literature / Comments

HEG T:220f.

2. Reconstruction

2.1Reconstruction ‘shoots’

While Hittite tarša- is attested as a collective, HLuw. /tarsanzi/ reflects a common gender noun in *-eh2-, which calls for the reconstruction of a Proto-Anatolian stem in *-eh2-. No etymology is suggested by Tischler (HEG T:220f.), rejecting Hoffner’s (Hoffner 1974a:143) suggestion of a connection with Hitt. tars- ‘to dry’ (PIE *ters-). Without a Proto-Indo-European etymology, the root-final alveolar can be either *t, *d or *dh. The ablaut of the root is also unclear, although, due to the retention of the sequence /-rs-/, a zero-grade of the root with an accented suffix is expected (see Melchert 1994a:163).

[D.S.]

Cross-references

Referred to from this article