/hurnalla/i-/, hú+ra/i-na-li-

‘hunter’

Language
Hieroglyphic Luwian
Grammar
subst, c.
ID
3745

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Hieroglyphic Luwian

/hurnalla/i-/, hú+ra/i-na-li-

‘hunter’

1.1.1Transmission

This lexeme is attested twice in inscriptions from Kululu dating to the mid- or late 8th century BCE.

[A.P.]

1.1.2Forms

dat./loc. sg. /hurnalli/ hú+ra/i-na-li KULULU lead strip 1, §7.38 (Kululu)
dat./loc. pl. /hurnallanz/ hú+ra/i-na-la-za KULULU lead strip 2, §3.15 (Kululu)

[A.P.]

1.1.3Graphic Features

1.1.3.1Phonological Interpretation

The phonological interpretation of this word can be deemed secure, because the spelling evidence from HLuw. is combined with the cognates such as Hittite ḫurna- ‘to hunt’ (see Kalaç 1978a:123f., cf. also HW 2nd ed. Ḫ:761 and HEG A-Ḫ:305). The suffix is likewise known from many other formations, cf. the discussion of the stem below.

[AH.B.]

1.1.4Meaning

The connection with Hittite ḫurna- ‘to hunt’ was first made by Kalaç 1978a:123f.Despite suggesting the link, Kalaç inexplicably chose ‘shepherd’ (“Hirte, Schäfer”) as a translation for the HLuw. word; later scholars understandably opted for ‘hunter’ instead’. and has been followed by scholars since, cf. e.g. Hawkins 1987a:141 and Hawkins 2006b:53. In the HLuw. corpus, the word is exclusive to the KULULU lead strips, whose economic character is clear, yet they present unique challenges for their brevity. They seem to record allocations of goods, and KULULU lead strip 2, §3.15 reads: 20 OVIS-sa 2 hú+ra/i-na-la-za, approx. /… hawis tuwanz hurnallanz/, translating as ‘Twenty sheep to two hunters’ (cf. Hawkins 2000a:510).

[AH.B.]

1.1.5Stem

The attested forms show that the word undergoes i-mutation, ruling out an agent noun in /-alla-/ (pace Giusfredi 2012b:149f.). Instead, the word represents a substantivised adjective in /-alla/i-/ (see Sasseville 2014-2015a:109f. for the differentiation between the two suffixes), deriving from an unattested noun */hurna-/ ‘hunt’ vel sim., closely related to Hittite ḫurna- ‘to hunt’. Meriggi & Poetto 1982a:106 point out that the base word is frequently found in proper names.

[AH.B.]

2. Reconstruction

2.1Reconstruction

The Hittite verb ḫuwarn-/ḫurn- (HW 2nd ed. Ḫ:761) is of unknown conjugation, but historically represents a nasal infix to a root ending with a laryngeal, i.e. *Hu̯er-né-H-/Hu̯r̥-n-H-´ (cf. EDHIL:372). The nominal derivation in HLuw. /hurnalla/i-/ can be adduced here but does not offer any new information. An Indo-European etymology involving potential Baltic cognates has been suggested (cf. HED H:433, HEG A-H:305, HW 2nd ed. Ḫ:761). The rejection of Kloekhorst (EDHIL:372) concerning the etymology saying that the adduced cognates show no trace of a root-final laryngeal cannot be maintained, because the laryngeal may be seen as an extension, or the laryngeal may have been lost without a trace by sound law in the pre-history of the cognates.

A different approach might be to connect it with the root of Hitt. and Pal.*ḫuwarna- ‘to sprinkle’, which cannot be phonologically differentiated. The question remains whether the semantics of ‘sprinkling’ can be linked to the ones of ‘hunting’ or better ‘shooting (arrows)’.

[D.S.]

Cross-references

Referred to from this article