*tórmo-
‘nail, peg’
- Language
- Proto-Anatolian
- Grammar
- subst, c.
- ID
- 1480
1. Individual Anatolian Languages
1.1 Cuneiform Luwian
tarm(i)-
‘nail, peg’1.1.1Transmission
All attestations are found in NS copies of ritual incantations.
[E.R.]
1.1.2Forms
| nom. sg. | GAG-iš | KBo 9.145, 11´ | (CTH 770, NS) |
| nom. pl. | GIŠGAGḪI.A | KBo 9.145, 12’ | (CTH 770, NS) |
| abl./instr. | tar-ma-ti | KBo 9.145, 4’ | (CTH 770, NS) |
| [tar]-ma-ti | KUB 32.8 (+) KUB 32.5 iv 24’ | (CTH 759, NS) | |
| gen. adj. nom. pl. c. | tar-ma-a-aš-ši-in-⸢zi⸣ | KUB 32.7, 5’ | (CTH 762, NS) |
| unclear | tar-mi-[ | KBo 9.145, 5’ | (CTH 770, NS) |
The assignment of ]x-mi-iš-ti-ta at KBo 9.143 iii! 2 (Starke 1985b:121 reads ta]r-mi-iš-ti-ta) is less than assured.
[E.R.]
1.1.3Graphic Features
Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv.
[E.R.]
1.1.4Meaning
The semantic elucidation of the noun goes back to Otten (apud Friedrich 1952a:386), who recognized it as a cognate of Hitt. tarma- c. ‘nail, peg’. His translation is commonly adopted in the handbooks (see DLL:92, CLL:213, HEG T/D:185-189, Tischler 2008a:190, Starke 1990a:53, EDHIL:844f.). For its use in a figura etymologica with its denominative derivative tarm(a)i-(di), see under the Lemma of the verb.
[E.R.]
1.1.5Stem
The forms listed above with the stem ending in -a- and -i- show that word belongs to the mutating stems in -C(i)-.
[E.R.]
1.1.6Derivatives
1.2 Luwian in Hittite transmission
tarm(i)-
‘nail, peg’1.2.1Transmission
Apart from the numerous a-stem attestations of the lexeme, i-stem forms occur twice in a NS library catalog.
[E.R.]
1.2.2Forms
| nom. sg. | tar-mi-iš | KUB 8.36 iii 4, iii 11 | (CTH 279, NS) |
1.2.3Graphic Features
Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv.
[E.R.]
1.2.4Meaning
For the meaning, see under CLuw. tarm(i)-.
[E.R.]
1.2.5Origin
Obviously, there is no distinction between the nom. sg. form in -iš of a Hittite lexeme showing sporadic i-mutation and its homophonous Luwian cognate regularly ending in -iš.
[E.R.]
1.3 Lycian A
*trm͂me/i-
‘nail, peg’1.3.1Transmission
Laroche 1976a:19 connects the Lycian base of trm͂mis- ‘Lycia’ and trm͂mile/i- ‘Lycian’ (Greek Τερμίλαι and Τερμεσσος) with Luw. tarm(i)- c. and Hitt. tarma- c. ‘nail, peg’. He justifies the semantics by pointing out that the word *trm͂me/i- should have also been able to refer to the peak of a mountain. This can be further supported by the Bronze Age toponym KURtarmaimiš ‘having (mountain) peaks’. His etymology is accepted by Neumann 2007a:376f. (contra Milani 2001a:282 n. 37 and Carruba 2011a:312, who traces the name trm͂mis- back to the Bronze Age city name Attarimma).
[D.S.]
2. Reconstruction
2.1Reconstruction ‘nail, peg’
The comparison of Hitt. tarma- c. ‘nail, peg’, Luw. tarm(i)- c. ‘id.’ and Lyc. *trm͂me/i- leads to the reconstruction of a Proto-Anatolian substantive *tórmo- c. ‘nail, peg’ (Melchert 1994a:99, Kimball 1999a:381, EDHIL:844f., HEG T:186f., Sasseville 2021a:229). The o-grade in the root is based on the Greek cognate τόρμος ‘socket (in which a peg is stuck)’, whereas a zero-grade would also be phonologically possible based on the Anatolian cognates alone. Both Hittite and Luwian created a denominative verb from this substantive, i.e. Hitt. tarmā(i)-(mi) and CLuw. tarm(a)i-(di), which appear to be independent from one another, because they do not continue the same derivational suffixes, i.e. *-éh2-i̯e/o- and *-éi̯e/o- respectively.
[D.S.]
3. Proto-Indo-European
3.1Semantic Reconstruction
PIE *torh1-mo- m. means ‘nail, peg; hole, socket’. However, the semantic difference between ‘nail, peg’, on the one hand, and ‘hole, socket’, on the other, might require the reconstruction of two formally similar, but semantically different stems, one meaning *‘piercing, boring (thing)’ > ‘nail, peg’ and the other *‘pierced, bored, drilled (thing)’ > ‘hole, socket’.
3.2Morphological Reconstruction
Hitt. tarma- c. ‘nail, peg’, Luw. tarm(i)- c. ‘id.’, and Lyc. *trm͂me/i- ‘id.’ point to a Proto-Anatolian stem *tormo- c. ‘nail, peg’ (cf. above sub PAnat. Reconstruction with further lit.). According to Nussbaum 2010a:275 n. 20, “Hitt. tarma- […] presumably reflects *tor(h1)-mo-”, which is based on the PIE root *terh1- ‘to pierce, drill, bore, rub’ vel sim. (LIV²:632f.) and lost its internal laryngeal in PIE already due to de Saussure’s Law (PIE *oRHC > *oRC). Nussbaum ibid. plausibly adds that “Hitt. tarma- certainly has its best Greek comparandum in τόρμος ‘hole, socket’ (Hdt.+) and not in τέρμα [‘boundary, limit, end’] or τέρμων [‘boundary, end’]”. A further cognate is probably PGerm. *þarma- m. ‘bowel, intestine, gut’ (OHG darm, etc.). In EDHIL:845, the connection of Hitt. tarma- and Gk. τόρμος with the Germanic word is dismissed as “semantically unattractive”. Yet, the semantics can be plausibly accounted for, according to Kluge & Seebold 2011a:181 s.v. Darm: “Ausgangsbedeutung ist also ‘Loch’. Gemeint ist der Mastdarm vom After aus, nicht in erster Linie das Gedärm von Schlachttieren” (likewise EWAhd II:542f.). The combined evidence of Anatolian, Greek, and Germanic thus points to a PIE noun *torh1-mo- ‘nail, peg; hole, socket’. However, the difference between the meanings ‘nail, peg’ and ‘hole, socket’, which seem difficult to reconcile, might require the reconstruction of two formally similar, but semantically distinct stems (see above sub Semantic Reconstruction). – The underlying root PIE *terh1- ‘to pierce, drill, bore, rub’ vel sim. is well attested, with a variety of nominal and verbal derivatives (cf., e.g., IEW:1071f., EIEC:36, 424, Watkins 2000a:91 s.v. terǝ-1, LIV²:632f.).
[T.S.]
4. Transmission
ON þarmr m. ‘bowel, intestine, gut’, OE þearm m. ‘id.’, OS tharm m. ‘id.’, OHG darm m. ‘id.’, etc.Cf., e.g., EWAhd II:541–543 s.v. darm, Kluge & Seebold 2011a:181 s.v. Darm, EDPG:535 s.v. *þarma-.

