/is(a)u-/
‘to ruin (?)’
- Language
- Common Luwian
- Grammar
- verb
- ID
- 1421
1. Individual Anatolian Languages
1.1 Hieroglyphic Luwian
/isau-/, i-sa-u-
‘to ruin (?)’1.1.1Transmission
This lexeme is a hapax legomenon, attested once in a letter from Assur, which dates to the late 8th century BCE.
[AH.B.]
1.1.2Forms
| 3pl. pret. ind. act. | /isaunta/ | i-sa-u-ta | ASSUR letter f+g, §28 (Assur) |
1.1.3Graphic Features
1.1.3.1Phonological Interpretation
Even though the lexeme is a hapax legomenon, its phonological interpretation is relatively certain. Its explicit syllabic rendition in HLuw. is matched by the potential CLuw. cognate išumma, a participle in /-mma/i-/ of the same verb (cf. Sasseville 2021a:193f.).
[AH.B.]
1.1.4Meaning
Long attributed to the paradigm of the HLuw. verb /i(ya)ssa-(i)/ ‘to buy’, the present lexeme recently received a new interpretation by Sasseville 2021a:193f. On both morphological and contextual grounds, Sasseville links HLuw. /isau-/ to Hittite išuwan- ‘salt’ (Prechel 2019a) and assigns to it a meaning such as ‘to ruin’ vel sim.
[AH.B.]
1.1.5Stem
The verb shows the strange allomorph /-(a)u-/, for which see Sasseville 2021a:190f.
[AH.B.]
1.2 Cuneiform Luwian
išumma
‘ruined (?)’1.2.1Transmission
The lexeme is found only on obscure fragments, which cannot be classified yet. Melchert (CLL:96) lists išumma as a potential Luwian word, but calls this claim into question at the same time. Sasseville 2021a:193 takes the fragment KUB 35.155, on which išumma is attested, as genuine Luwian and brings further evidence for the Luwian existence of a stem /is(a)u-/.
[D.S.]
1.2.2Forms
| nom./acc. pl. n. | i-šu-um-ma | KUB 35.155 obv. 4’ | (CTH 770, NS) |
| unclear | i-˹šu˺-[ | KUB 35.129, 5’ | (CTH 770, NS) |
1.2.3Graphic Features
Checked against the photographs in the Konkordanz (Mainzer Fotoarchiv). For the reading of KUB 35.129, 5’, see Starke 1985b:414.
[D.S.]
1.2.4Meaning
The meaning of išumma and iš[u- cannot be determined, because both occur in fragmentary contexts. Sasseville 2021a:193f. assigns them to the same paradigm as that of HLuw. i-sa-u-ta, which must have a negative meaning on contextual grounds. He suggests ‘to ruin, go bad’ and calls attention to the Hittite word išuwan- ‘salt’ (Prechel 2019a), which can be used to cleanse animals and dispose of their impurities.
[D.S.]
1.2.5Stem
The word išumma can be best interpreted as a participle in -mma/i-, although an abstract noun in -man-/-mn- (or assimilated (-mm-)) should not be excluded (for which see Starke 1990a:243f.).
[D.S.]

