*463.*398

‘field master (?)’

Language
Hieroglyphic Luwian
Grammar
subst
ID
3675

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Hieroglyphic Luwian

*463.*398

‘field master (?)’

1.1.1Transmission

This lexeme is attested twice in inscriptions from Emirgazi and Konya dating to the late 13th century BCE. 

[A.P.]

1.1.2Forms

unclear /…/ *463.*398 YALBURT frag. 1, §3b (Konya)
      EMİRGAZİ 3, §1b (Emirgazi)

Both attestations of this word include *463, but it differs in shape from its other occurrences at Emirgazi. Usually, the shape of *463 seems to contain the sign at the top, yet in the present cases the part is missing, which begs the question if it constitutes an inherent part of the shape in the first place. If not, those occurrences of *463 that contain may need to be re-transliterated as 〈(DEUS)*463〉 vel sim.; they all occurs with deity names.

[A.P.] [AH.B.]

1.1.3Graphic Features

1.1.3.1Phonological Interpretation

Unclear. The word consists of two signs that have so far gone without syllabic interpretations, and their logographic interpretations are, if anything, recent. Regarding *463, Schürr 2017b:34 proposes a transliteration as , following Hawkins 2006b:59; no interpretation has been put forward for *398 so far.

[AH.B.]

1.1.4Meaning

The meaning of this word is not entirely clear, but it is likely a title or constitutes part of a title; if the latter, it would most likely modify ‘hunter’.The latter option is the one advanced by Yakubovich 2017e:s.v., who tentatively proposes a meaning ‘of game’ for the word. Hawkins 2006b:59 suggests a tentative ‘field master (?)’ vel sim., based on the combined meaning of the two signs; *398 is found on seals and represents a title in those cases. The context at YALBURT frag. 1, §3b reads: a-wa/i-mi HEROS *463.*398 CANIS.ZU(WA) MAGNUS.REX, approx. /a=wa=mi hastalis … zunawalis hantawatturas/, translating as ‘ I (am) the hero, field master (?), the hunter, the great-king’ (cf. Hawkins 1995a:68f., 79 and Poetto 1993a:53f.).

[AH.B.]

1.1.5Stem

Unknown. If the word should indeed be a title, it is likely a common gender noun.

[AH.B.]