*h2ot-éh2-
‘(a damaging action)’
- Language
- Proto-Luwic
- Grammar
- subst, c.
- ID
- 3586
1. Individual Anatolian Languages
1.1 Cuneiform Luwian
ḫatta-
‘piercing, striking’1.1.1Transmission
So far, the lexeme occurs only in passages from the Tauriša tradition (from MS onwards).
[E.R.]
1.1.2Forms
| nom./acc. coll. | ḫa-at-ta | KBo 13.260 iii 10’ | (CTH 766, NS) |
| ḫa-⸢at⸣-ta | KBo 13.260 ii 26 | (CTH 766, NS) |
Cf. also incomplete ḫa-at-t[a- at KUB 35.49 i 4’ and ḫa-at-ta-[ at KUB 35.95, 9’.
[E.R.]
1.1.3Graphic Features
Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv.
[E.R.]
1.1.4Meaning
The nouns ḫatta ‘piercing, striking’ and šēwa appear in parallel actions in a ritual for the mother and child: (9’)... ḫa-at-ta-in-zi (10’)ḫa-at-ta a-da-an-du (11’)ši-e-ḫu-wa-en-zi še-e-wa (12’)a-da-an-du “those related to piercing shall eat piercing, those related to cutting shall eat cutting” (KBo 13.260 iii 9’-12’; slightly different Starke 1990a:393 and Melchert apud Mouton & Yakubovich 2019a:217f.). The translation chosen here follows that of its Hittite match ḫatt- ‘to pierce, prick, stab, hit, strike, engrave’ (similar Starke 1990a:393: ‘Gewaltiges’ and CLL:63: ‘violent blow, harm’, followed in HHw:47 and Kimball 2015a:68).
[E.R.]
1.1.5Stem
The nom./acc. coll. form belongs to an unmutated action noun ḫatta- c. (CLL:63, Sasseville 2021a:104, Kimball 2015a:68).
[E.R.]
1.1.6Derivatives
1.2 Lycian A
xtta-
‘damage, harm’1.2.1Transmission
This lexeme is a hapax attested in a sepulchral inscription.
[O.B.]
1.2.2Forms
| nom./acc. coll. | xtta | TL 118.2 (Limyra) |
The reading of the form as xttaẽ (acc. sg.) in Neumann 2007a:135 is surely erroneous. The phonotactics of such a word are unprecedented elsewhere in Lycian and the attested text actually has a word divider between xtta and ẽ.
[O.B.]
1.2.3Meaning
Lyc. A xtta- is only attested as a collective in the clause se xtta : ẽ : adi ‘and if (s)he does x.’. The context of the passage with a punishment clause in the following line strongly suggests that xtta has a negative connotation. Etymological considerations indicate a meaning like ‘damage, harm’ (cf. other related Anatolian lemmata and derivatives, see also CLL:63, DLL:85, Melchert 2014d:210, Sasseville 2021a:86, contra Christiansen 2020a:252 ‘alteration’).
[O.B.]
1.2.4Stem
On the basis of the CLuw. cognate ḫatta-, without i-mutation, it seems most likely that Lyc. A xtta- is an a-stem, although the single attestation does not prove this beyond doubt.
[O.B.]
1.2.5Derivatives
2. Reconstruction
2.1Reconstruction ‘(a damaging action)’
The comparison between CLuw. ḫatta- and Lyc. xtta- allows to reconstruct a Proto-Luwic collective noun *h2ot-éh2-, though probably underlying an original τομή-type (Sasseville 2021a:104; pace Kimball 2015a:68, who straightaway reconstructs a thematic o-stem).
[D.S.]
For the lemma head, see CLuw. *ḫatt-.

