LAPIS

‘tanding stone (?)’

Language
Hieroglyphic Luwian
Grammar
subst
ID
3314

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Hieroglyphic Luwian

LAPIS

‘tanding stone (?)’

1.1.1Transmission

This hapax is attested in a single inscription from Malatya, dating to the early 11th or 10th century BCE.

[A.P.]

1.1.2Forms

(nom.)/acc. sg. /…/ LAPIS DARENDE, §3 (Malatya)

It is not entirely clear if the attestation at DARENDE, §3 represents a separate lexeme, or if the logogram should be judged incomplete (thus implied by Hawkins 2000a:305) and the word be considered part of one of the lexemes that use STELE (i.e. LAPIS+SCALPRUM) in their spelling: HLuw. /wanid-/ ‘stele’, HLuw. /tanid-/ ‘installation’, or HLuw. /kuttassar(i)-/ ‘orthostat’, cf. the discussions below.

The attestation at DARENDE, §3 does not allow a glimpse at the grammatical gender of the word, because the preceding demonstrative pronoun /za-/ hosts a chain of clitics and its final /n/, if present, would be graphically elided: 〈za-pa-wa/i〉 can stand for nom./acc. sg. n. /za=ba=wa/ or acc. sg. c. /zan=ba=wa/.

[A.P.]

1.1.3Graphic Features

1.1.3.1Phonological Interpretation

Unknown, provided the spelling is not a mistake for , i.e. .Usually, appears with an inset (*268), a combination representing the semantogram . It is not clear what phonological form is represented by the logogram (sign *267), which is found with only one further word, viz. HLuw. /ziPattann(i)-/ ‘(a volume measure / tool)’, attested also with the logogram *255 besides.

The HLuw. corpus holds another word for ‘stone’, viz. HLuw. /assu-/, whose spelling consistently relies on the logogram (*268), either as a determinative or representing part or all of the phonological form of the word. The disparate choice of logograms suggests that stands for a word other than /assu-/.

[AH.B.]

1.1.4Meaning

Assuming that the present word is separate from those lexemes using at all, the semantic assignment ‘standing stone’ should be understood as provisional. A brief dedicatory inscription, DARENDE, §3 concludes the text: za-pa-wa/i LAPIS DEUS-ni PONERE-wa/i-ha, approx. /za(n?)=ba=wa … massani tuwahha/, meaning ‘I put up this standing stone for the deity’ (cf. Hawkins 2000a:305). The word behind quite likely references the carrier object of the text, a “[s]mall, 4-sided, round-topped, tapering stele” (Hawkins 2000a:304). Further finds of the sign may result in a reappraisal.

[AH.B.]

1.1.5Stem

Unclear. Even the grammatical gender of the word cannot be deduced form the context, cf. the discussion under Forms above.

[AH.B.]

Cross-references