ēr(ḫu)wa-
‘(the) interior (of a circle)’
- Language
- Cuneiform Luwian
- Class
- Derivative
- Grammar
- subst
- ID
- 2353
1. Individual Anatolian Languages
1.1 Cuneiform Luwian
ēr(ḫu)wa-
‘(the) interior (of a circle)’1.1.1Transmission
The attestations of the lexeme are distributed across the rituals of the Kuwattalla and the Tauriša traditions (from MS onwards).
[E.R.]
1.1.2Forms
| acc. sg. | e-er-wa-an | KBo 13.260 ii 31 | (CTH 766, NS) |
| nom. pl. | ⸢e⸣-er-wa-an-zi | KUB 35.28 i 6’ | (CTH 761, NS) |
| [e-er]-wa-an-zi | KUB 35.29 i 3’ | (CTH 761, NS) | |
| [i]r-ḫu-wa-an-⸢zi⸣ | KUB 35.21 rev. 24’ | (CTH 761, MS) | |
| ⸢e⸣-[er-ḫu-wa-an-zi] | KUB 32.9 obv. 10 | (CTH 761, MS) | |
| e-er-ḫ[u-wa-an-zi] | KBo 29.7, 5’ | (CTH 761, MS?) | |
| acc. pl. | [ir]-ḫu-u-wa-an-⸢za⸣ | KUB 35.50, 6’ | (CTH 759, NS) |
| e-er-ḫu-u-wa-an-⸢za⸣ | KBo 34.245, 6’ + KUB 35.64, 5’ | (CTH 762, NS) |
1.1.3Graphic Features
Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv, except for KUB 35.29 i 3’ and KUB 35.50, 6’.
[E.R.]
1.1.3.1Phonological Interpretation
Based on parallel contexts, Otten 1953a:104 recognized that ērḫuwalli(ya)- and ērwalli(ya)- are variants of the same word and already explained the difference with -ḫ(u)- as a “schwach artikulierten Laut”. The same account would also apply for the base word ēr(ḫu)wa-, the present lemma; for the phenomenon, cf. also Melchert 1994a:258. – Initial e-er- is obviously the attempt to spell an allophone [e] of the Luwian phoneme /i/ that emerged from the cross-linguistically frequent lowering process before /rḫ/ (Mouton & Yakubovich 2019a:216 with n. 12).
[E.R.]
1.1.4Meaning
The purely etymological interpretation of ēr(ḫu)wa- as the name of a disease by Meriggi 1962c:259 (and Meriggi 1980a:283) and Carruba 1982a:45 (and Carruba 1982b:3, followed in HHw:32, Hutter 2003a:262; skeptical HEG A-K:369f.) is not compatible with several of the contexts that show a merism with parittarwalli(ya)-, functioning as a description of CLuw. tapāru, curse and perjury or of evil word, defilement and impurity. This modifier may be adjectival or, as in the present case, a substantival apposition, but it does not denote an evil in itself.
Instead, Mouton & Yakubovich 2019a: 214-220, 224-229 propose to translate ēr(ḫu)wa- as ‘(the) interior (of a circle)’. Not only is it the likely base of the -i(t) stem ir(ḫ)ui(t)- ‘basket’ (← ‘insider’, implement for putting things inside; see under Lemma), but it also denotes the ‘inner circle’ of, or close attachment to the mother that a child would enjoy (for the context, see under ēḫḫui-(ti)). Finally, ir(ḫu)wa- modified by the genitival adjective of wašpant(i)- ‘shrouds, clothing’ (see under Lemma) occurs in a list of evils, which is compatible with a meaning ‘(the) interior of shrouds, clothing’, since that can well denote the dead bodies, the defiled underwear, or the defiled inside of a dress worn without underwear (Mouton & Yakubovich 2019a:216f.)
[E.R.]
1.1.5Stem
The endings identify the noun as a common gender non-mutating a-stem. Following Melchert 1982b: 44 n. 7 and Mouton & Yakubovich 2019a:218, the underlying root is irḫ- (i.e. see HLuw. /irh(i)-/ ‘border, boundary’), which is first derived with -wa(/i)- for polar adjectives (*irḫuwa(/i)- ‘interior’) and then turned into an abstract noun, i.e. ēr(ḫu)wa- c. ‘(the) interior’.
[E.R.]
1.1.6Derivatives
For the lemma head see CLuw. *irḫ(i)-.

