doppelter Glossenkeilḫūtanu(i)-

‘(unknown)’

Language
Cuneiform Luwian
Class
Base
Grammar
subst, c.
ID
4145

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Luwian (Glossenkeilwörter)

doppelter Glossenkeilḫūtanu(i)-

‘(unknown)’

1.1.1Transmission

Attestations of this gloss wedge word appear twice in the legend of Atramḫaši.

[E.R.]

1.1.2Forms

nom. pl. c. doppelter Glossenkeilḫu-ta-nu-en-zi KUB 8.63 iv 13’ (CTH 347, NS)
unknown doppelter Glossenkeilḫu-u-ta-nu[- KUB 8.63 iv 14’ (CTH 347, NS)

For the possible “colloquial” (i.e. in this context, Empire Luwian) origin of the acc. pl. form in -inzi, see Yakubovich 2010d:30f. and already van den Hout 2006a:236.

[E.R.]

1.1.3Graphic Features

Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv.

[E.R.]

1.1.4Meaning

The lexeme ḫūtanu(i)- is, in extant scholarship, consistently translated as ‘excavation pit’ (vel sim.): ‘Baugrube’ (HHw:57); ‘ditch; moat; excavation pit’ (DCL:95); and ‘taş ocağı’ (quarry) (Ünal 2016a:210). However, this is due to its frequent conflation with the Hittite term ḫūtanu- (ḫu-u-ta-nu-e-iš in KUB 31.86 ii 6 and ḫu-u-t[a]-nu-uš in KBo 32.14 iii 41, perhaps alsou-da-nu-i in KBo 62.5, 20; cf. HW 2nd ed. Ḫ:790), which indeed designates a ‘foundation pit.’ The meaning of the gloss wedge words doppelter Glossenkeilḫu-ta-nu-en-zi and doppelter Glossenkeilḫu-u-ta-nu[- in KUB 8.63 cannot be that of ‘excavation/foundation pit’, contra DCL:95. Their attestation in KUB 8.63 thus remains untranslated by Beckman 2019a:66, 78 in Ḫamša’s advice to his son Atramḫaši:

“Take the ḫūtanu! And when [the ant … ], the ḫaršanta and the ḫūtanu [ … ] Drive   out in the wagons! Drive out [in the chariots]! Take the grain for yourself [ … ] !”

HW 2nd ed. Ḫ:790f. also prefers to separate the two lemmata. Although the Hittite and Luwian terms may be cognates and the latter may indeed exhibit a metaphoric use of the former’s meaning, no suitable semantic interpretation comes to mind.

[E.R.]

1.1.5Stem

The i-mutated stem bears a resemblance to Hitt. ḫutanu-, although further clarification remains impossible while the Luwian term is undefined.

[E.R.]

1.1.6Origin

The noun is likely Luwian in origin, on account of the usage of the Glossenkeil in its Hittite transmission and the distinctly Luwian nom. pl. c. ending -enzi. It is also classified as a Luwian term by DLL:48, CLL:78, Melchert 2005a:449, van den Hout 2006a:236, 243, Yakubovich 2010d:30f., HW 2nd ed. Ḫ:790f., DCL:82.

[E.R.]

*This Lemma was written together with Marcello Koraicho.