doppelter Glossenkeillumpašt(i)- (luppašt(i)-)

‘reason for annoyance, chagrin’

Language
Cuneiform Luwian
Class
Derivative
Grammar
subst, c.
ID
4117

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Luwian (Glossenkeilwörter)

doppelter Glossenkeillumpašt(i)- (luppašt(i)-)

‘reason for annoyance, chagrin’

1.1.1Transmission

The word occurs in a New Hittite letter by Puduḫepa to Ramses II and in the incantation in a festival text.

[E.R.]

1.1.2Forms

nom. sg. [doppelter Glossenkeill]u-um-pa-aš-ti-iš KUB 21.38 rev. 11 (CTH 176, NS)
  doppelter Glossenkeil⸣lu-up-pa-aš-ti-iš KUB 36.97 rev. 1 (CTH 600, NS)
acc. sg. doppelter Glossenkeillu-um-p[a-aš-ti-i]n KUB 21.38 rev. 12 (CTH 176, NS)
  Glossenkeil(Glossenkeil)?lu-pa-aš-tén KUB 21.38 obv. 65 (CTH 176, NS)
  [doppelter Glossenkeil]lu-um-pa-aš-ti-in KUB 36.97 rev. 2 (CTH 600, NS)

1.1.3Graphic Features

Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv. – While one of the wedges preceding lupašten at KUB 21.38 obv. 65 represents the phonetic complement - in preceding zi-, the other marks directly before the sign LU are difficult to interpret (see HEG L-N:76). – The reading l]um-pa-ša-kán at HKM 53 obv. 9 by Alp 1991a:218 is less than assured. For a different interpretation, yet equally unlikely, see Hoffner 2009a:196.

[E.R.]

1.1.3.13.1 Phonological Interpretation

The alternation between lump- and lupp- may indicate difficulties in rendering the cluster of nasal + plosive or the weak articulation of the nasal before the plosive (Melchert 1994a:123).

[E.R.]

1.1.4Meaning

The contexts as cited in CHD L-N:85 permit a general semantic interpretation as ‘something unpleasant, displeasing, offensive, or annoying’, or more concretely ‘chagrin’, ‘offense’ vel sim. One or the other entered the handbooks and editions; cf. first Güterbock apud HW:131; also Otten 1956a:102, DLL:64, CLL:129 and DCL:137 (‘regret’), Edel 1994a:221 (‘Verdruß’) and 223 (‘Kränkung’), Melchert 1994a:123 (‘chagrin, regret’), HEG L-N:76f., HHw:95, Ünal 2007a:412, Kronasser 1966a:45, 208, HED L:118f., Hoffner 2009a:287-289. At the same time and much like Hitt. kattawatar, denoting both ‘vengeance’ and ‘grounds for vengeance’, lumpašt(i)- means ‘chagrin (vel sim.)’ and ‘grounds for chagrin (vel sim.)’.

[E.R.]

1.1.5Stem

It is generally agreed that lumpašt(i)-, derived from the root lu(m)p-, contains an abstract suffix -ašt(i)-, cognate with Hitt. -ašti- in dalugašti- ‘length’ etc. (Kronasser 1966a:45, HEG L-N:76f., HED L:118f.; for the suffix, see Höfler 2015a:167-172).

[E.R.]

1.1.6Compounds

1.1.7Derivatives

  1. luppašduwal(i)-

1.1.8Origin

On account of the use of gloss wedges, the term was regarded as Luwian in several publications, see DLL:64, CLL:129, Melchert 1999e:366, HHw:95, Melchert 2005a:450, van den Hout 2006a:241, 246, HED L:118f. (with question mark), Höfler 2015a:167, 171f., DCL:137. Nothing speaks against this linguistic assignment, and Melchert (DCL:138) convincingly argues that the suffix -wal(i)- in the derivative luppašduwal(i)- supports it.

[E.R.]

For the lemma head see CLuw. *lumpa-.

Cross-references

Referred to from this article