piḫaimma/i-
‘glorified (?)’
- Language
- Cuneiform Luwian
- Grammar
- adj
- ID
- 4007
1. Individual Anatolian Languages
1.1 Luwian in Hittite transmission
piḫaimma/i-
‘glorified (?)’1.1.1Transmission
This lexeme is attested as a divine epithet in cult inventories, in contracts, in oracle texts, all of which are New Hittite compositions.
[D.S.]
1.1.2Forms
| nom. sg. c. | pí-ḫa-i-mi-iš | KUB 12.2 i 18’ | (CTH 526, LNS) |
| [p]í-⸢ḫa⸣-i-mi-iš | KBo 42.27 rev. 3 | (CTH 527, NS) | |
| pí-ḫa-i-mi-i-iš | KUB 12.2 iii 1 | (CTH 526, LNS) | |
| pí-ḫa-im-mi-iš | KBo 4.10+ obv. 53’ | (CTH 106, NS) | |
| pí-ḫa-im-me-iš | AT 454 vi 1 | (CTH 577, NS) | |
| pí-ḫa-i-me-iš | DAAM 1.41 i 5 | (CTH 530, LNS) | |
| Dpi-ḫa-i-mi-iš | KBo 70.109+ iii 27’ | (CTH 527, LNS) | |
| Dpí-ḫa-i-mi-i[š] | KBo 70.109+ ii 37 | (CTH 527, NS) | |
| Dp[í-ḫa-i]-mi-iš | KBo 70.109+ ii 43 | (CTH 527, NS) | |
| ⸢D⸣pí-ḫa-i-mi-i[š] | KBo 70.109+ ii 48 | (CTH 527, NS) | |
| Dpí-ḫa-⸢i-mi-iš⸣ | KUB 38.6+ iv 11’ | (CTH 527, LNS) | |
| [Dpí-ḫ]a-i-mi-iš | KUB 38.6+ ii 9’ | (CTH 527, LNS) | |
| Dpí-ḫ[a-i-mi-iš] | KUB 38.6 + Bo 6741 iv 2’/3’ | (CTH 527, LNS) | |
| ⸢Dpí-ḫa-i-mi-iš⸣ | KBo 70.109+ ii 17 | (CTH 527, NS) | |
| ⸢D⸣pí-ḫa-i-mi-[iš] | KBo 70.109+ ii 9 | (CTH 527, NS) | |
| D⸢pí⸣-[ḫa-i-mi-iš] | KBo 70.109+ i 14’ | (CTH 527, NS) | |
| [Dpí-ḫa-i-mi-i]š | KBo 70.109+ iv 10’ | (CTH 527, NS) | |
| stem form | pí-ḫa-i-mi | KUB 38.12 iii 19’ | (CTH 527, NS) |
| KBo 56.59, 5’ | (CTH 530, NS) | ||
| unclear | pí-ḫa-a-e-m[i(-) | KBo 26.161 iii 3’ | (CTH 529, NS) |
1.1.3Graphic Features
Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv. – No photo is available for Bo 6741 and AT 454.* The rare spelling with -āe-, just like with -ai-, renders the diphthong /ai/.
[D.S.]
1.1.4Meaning
Based on an attestation in HLuw., in which the same participle is used to modify the victorious king, the epithets of the Storm-god piḫamma/i- and piḫaimma/i- have been translated accordingly as ‘glorified’ (thus HEG P:603). Differently, Puhvel (HED PE, PI, PU:74f.) translates it as ‘strong, mighty’ based on the Phoenician bilingual inscription of Karatepe, in which /pihassa/ corresponds to Phoenician ‘powerful strength’ (see under lemma). Melchert (CLL:176) suggests a sense ‘imbued with splendour/might’, which connects the two concepts (followed in CHD P:253 and DCL:187). It is left untranslated by Götze 1951b:72, Laroche 1959a:81, Cammarosano 2018a:439, 456. The meaning ‘glorified (?)’ seems the best fit considering the HLuw. passage (see under HLuw. /pihamma/i-/), the Hittite passages themselves, however, contribute no evidence for or against this interpretation.
[D.S.]
1.1.5Stem
The existence of a formation in -aimma/i- next to one in -amma/i- speaks for the existence of two denominal formations, i.e. piḫā(i)-(di) and piḫa-(ti), which are otherwise unattested. A similar approach was taken by Starke 1990a:314, although he assumed the base of piḫamma/i- to be a root verb of the ḫi-conjugation with an acrostatic paradigm, which would be an isolated formation. Sasseville 2021a:26, 121 brings further evidence for parallel formations in -a-(ti) (factitive) next to -ā(i)-(di) not only in Luwian, Lycian and Lydian, but also in Hittite. Differently, Melchert (CLL:176, DCL:187) suggests that -aimma/i- is a denominal formation derived from the unattested nominal base *piḫa-, which is not supported by the existing parallel derivation in -amma/i-. Therefore, his approach is not accepted here.
As is usual for Luwian formations in -mma/i- attested in Hittite context, the geminate -mm- is often spelled single, i.e. -m-, which has no linguistic relevance.
[D.S.]
1.1.6Origin
Due to its morphology and its association with the word family of *piḫa-, the Luwian origin of piḫaimma/i- has long been clear (Götze 1951b:72, Laroche 1959a:81, HEG P:603, HED PE, PI, PU:74f., DCL:187).
[D.S.]
*The forms in the table were checked together with Marian Wehrstein.
1.2 Luwian (other transmission)
piḫaimma/i-
‘glorified (?)’1.2.1Transmission
The attestation of this epithet of the Storm-god is mentioned in an Akkadian text, whose author was probably a Luwian priest from Kizzuwatna.
[D.S.]
1.2.2Forms
| part. nom. sg. c. | pí-ḫa-im-mì-iš | AT 454 VI 1 (Alalaḫ) |
| part. stem form | [pí-ḫ]a-im-mi | Emar 472, 24’ |
| pí-ḫa-im-mi | Emar 472, 48’ |
For the text from Emar, see Arnaud 1986a.
[D.S.]
1.2.3Meaning
The translation depends on the interpretation chosen for the epithet in Hittite transmission (see above). Laroche 1988a:113, 115 and Prechel 2008b:244-246 leave it untranslated, whereas Archi 2014a:154 opts for the meaning ‘mighty’.
[D.S.]

