ḫāpiri(ya)-

‘desert-dweller, semi-nomad’

Language
Cuneiform Luwian
Grammar
adj
ID
3851

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Cuneiform Luwian

ḫāpiri(ya)-

‘desert-dweller, semi-nomad’

1.1.1Transmission

All occurrences of the adjective originate from the rituals of the Kuwattalla tradition (from MS onwards). It is possibly attested as a personal name in Hieroglyphic Luwian, i.e. Iha-pi+ra/i-ia (dat. sg.) (KULULU lead strip 1 line 7, 20, 49).

[E.R.]

1.1.2Forms

nom. sg. c. ⸣ḫa-pí-[ri-iš] KUB 35.46 iv! 7’ (CTH 761, NS)
  ḫa-a-p[í-i-ri-i-iš] KUB 35.49 iv 15 (CTH 761, MS)
 nom./acc. sg. n. ḫ[a-pí-ri-ia-an] KUB 35.21 obv. 9’ (CTH 761, MS)
  ḫa-pí-ri-ia-an KUB 35.45 ii 3 (CTH 760, NS)
  ḫa-ap-pí-ri-ia-an KUB 35.43 iii 31’ (CTH 761, NS)
  ha-a-pí-i-ri-⸢ia⸣-an KUB 35.49 i 8’ (CTH 761, MS)
  ḫa-a-pí-r[i-ia-an] KUB 60.36, 11’ (CTH 762, NS)
  ḫa-a-pí-i-ri-pa[b-pab] KUB 32.14, 13’ (CTH 761, NS)
 nom./acc. pl. n. ḫ[a-pí-ri-e-ia] KUB 9.6 i 30 (CTH 759, LNS)
 abl./instr. [ḫ]a-pí-ri-ia-ti KUB 35.48 iii 9’ (CTH 760, NS)

For the morphological analysis of lūlaḫieya (and thus of ḫ[apirieya] also) as nom./acc. pl. n., see Carruba 1982a:35-38 and Melchert 1990a:199f. (against the former analysis as dat./loc. sg. by Laroche 1958a:192f. and Starke 1990a:37).

[E.R.]

1.1.3Graphic Features

Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv.*

[E.R.]

1.1.4Meaning

The appears in collocation with ḫāpiri(ya)- in a list of several adjectival merisms used to provide an exhaustive evil such as perjury (Mouton & Yakubovich 2019a:212f.). The terms lūlaḫi(ya)- ḫāpiri(ya)- have a pejorative connotation (Beal 1992a:108-111) and refer to two marginal social groups, the latter being classified as desert-dwellers and semi-nomads (DLL:41, Laroche 1946-1947a:122, HW:424, CLL:56, HHw:40, Yakubovich & Mouton 2023b:411, DCL:s.v.). Hittite texts offer more information than the Luwian rituals; cf. Beal 1992a:108-111, Haas & Wegner 1999a, HW 2nd ed. Ḫ:249f.; for the non-Anatolian evidence, see Bottéro 1972-1975a, Loretz 1984a, Astour 1999a, Richter 2012a:236 and del Olmo Lete & Sanmartín 2015a:489f.

[E.R.]

1.1.5Stem

The Luwian stem ends in the adjectival -i(ya)- suffix (Carruba 1982a:35-38 and Melchert 1990a:199f.).

[E.R.]

1.1.6Origin

Scholars do not fully agree regarding the provenance of the word. While Haas & Wegner 1999a renew the old proposal by Landsberger and Cazelles of a Hurrian origin and analyze the word as Hurr. ḫab=i=ri ‘the mobile one’, other scholars in Hittitology presuppose a (West-)Semitic borrowing, e.g. HW 2nd ed. Ḫ:250, Yakubovich 2010d:352f.; see also the arguments presented in Loretz 1984a:235-248, CAD Ḫ:84f., Krebernik 1985a:150-152 as well as Richter 2012a:236 and del Olmo Lete & Sanmartín 2015a:489f. for further references).

[E.R.]

*The forms in the table were checked together with Marian Wehrstein.

1.2 Hittite

ḫāpiri(ya)-

‘desert-dweller, semi-nomad’

1.2.1Literature / Comments

HW 2nd ed. Ḫ:249f. (= SA.GAZ)