šalḫitt(i)-
‘plenty, growth (vel sim.)’
- Language
- Cuneiform Luwian
- Grammar
- subst, c.
- ID
- 3387
1. Individual Anatolian Languages
1.1 Luwian in Hittite transmission
šalḫitt(i)-
‘plenty, growth (vel sim.)’1.1.1Transmission
This lexeme is found in a ritual text for a man (CTH 492), in the myth of Telipinu and related fragments (CTH 324, 325) and in a ritual for Ištar of Ninive.
[D.S.]
1.1.2Forms
| nom. sg. | šal-ḫi-it-ti-iš | KUB 47.59 obv. 10’ | (CTH 492, NS) |
| šal-ḫi-it-ti-i[š] | KUB 33.12 iv 22’ | (CTH 324, NS) | |
| acc. sg. | šal-ḫi-it-ti-in | KBo 2.9 i 23’ | (CTH 716, LNS) |
| KBo 23.3, 4’ | (CTH 458, MS?) | ||
| [šal?-ḫi?-it?-t]i?-˹in˺ | KUB 33.24 i 9 | (CTH 325, LNS) |
Pace CHD Š:92, KUB 47.59 obv. 16’ is not an additional attestation, but rather the same one as KUB 47.59 obv. 10’. The last restored form could belong to the other lexeme šalḫant(i)- instead. For the lexeme šalḫant(i)-, which results from a different stem formation, see under lemma.
[D.S.]
1.1.3Graphic Features
Checked against the photographs in the Konkordanz (Mainzer Fotoarchiv).
[D.S.]
1.1.4Meaning
The lexeme šalḫitt(i)- is mainly attested in beneficial formulas and often paired with mannitt(i)- ‘fertility’, then refering to a natural condition. From a contextual and an etymological perspective with Hitt. šalli- ‘great’, it is usually translated with ‘growth, prosperity (vel sim.)’ (CHD Š:92, HEG S:765f., CLL:186, Hoffner 1998b:18 “plenty”, Tischler 2008a:157, Fuscagni 2011b, Melchert 2014e:261, but left untranslated by Beckman 1983a:55 and Mazoyer 2003a:80, and doubted by EDHIL:710), although the basic sense should be ‘magnitude, plenty’ as per Hoffner (since it occurs right after miyātar ‘growth, prosperity’ in KBo 2.9 i 23’, the same sense for šalḫitt(i)- appears redundant, even though a (near-)synonym is entirely possible).
[D.S.]
1.1.5Stem
Melchert 1999d:23 compares convincingly the parallel formations of šalḫitt(i)- and šalḫant(i)- with those of Hitt. tukzi- (< Pre-Hitt. *tuk-ti-) and tukanzi- (Pre-Hitt. *tuk-ant-i-). For the base of the formation in -tt(i)-, Melchert 2014e:261 assumes a substantive in -i-, which he also takes as the source of the i-adjective, which is wholly unnecessary. The formation šalḫ-i-tt(i)- with the retention of the -i- implies an old formation built on the i-adjective *šalḫ-i- before the paradigmatic phenomenon of i-mutation developed, i.e. šalḫ-a/i- (with derivational vowel -a-).
[D.S.]
For the lemma head see CLuw. šalḫa(/i)-.

