marš/zaštarr(i)-

‘falsehood, sacrilege, desecration’

Language
Cuneiform Luwian
Grammar
subst, c.
ID
2864

1. Individual Anatolian Languages

1.1 Luwian in Hittite transmission

marš/zaštarr(i)-

‘falsehood, sacrilege, desecration’

1.1.1Transmission

The noun marš/zaštarr(i)- is found in Hittite ritual texts, instructions and oracle reports (from MS onwards). The following list includes representative examples from approx. 30 attestations cited in CHD L-N:198f.

[E.R.]

1.1.2Forms

nom. sg. mar-ša-aš-tar-ri-iš KBo 12.116 rev. 5 (CTH 456, NS)
  [ma]r-ša-tar-ri-iš-š(=) KUB 18.29 i? 8’ (CTH  577, NS)
  mar-za-aš-tar-ri-iš-š(=) KUB 18.27, 19 (CTH  574, NS)
acc. sg. mar-ša-aš-tar-ri-in KBo 23.1 i 6’ (CTH 472, NS)
gen. sg. mar-ša-aš-tar-ra-aš KUB 5.10 obv. 19 (CTH 567, NS)
dat./loc. sg. mar-za-tar-ri KUB 50.44 ii 6’ (CTH 572, NS)

1.1.3Graphic Features

Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv.

[E.R.]

1.1.3.1Phonological Interpretation

The spellings with ⟨z⟩ render a sound /ts/, which arose either by dissimilation in close vicinity to /s/ (HEG L-N:145, Starke 1986a:162) or by epenthesis of an alveolar stop in the cluster /rs/ (Melchert 1994a:272). – The divergent spellings mar/zaštarr- and marš/zatarr- point to phonological sequence /marstarr-/ or /martstarr-/ (with syncope?). – For another epenthesis within the cluster /sr/, see under Stem.

[E.R.]

1.1.4Meaning

The semantics of marš/zaštarr(i)- ‘falsehood, sacrilege, desecration’ were first elucidated by Friedrich 1934a:361 n. 9 and confirmed in Laroche 1949-1950a:24f. (‘fraude’). Later, the assigned meaning including the relevant contexts is treated again in CHD L-N:198f. and Starke 1986a:162 and Starke 1990a:393-396 (cf. also HW:137, HEG L-N:145f., HED M:85, CLL:141, HHw:113, Ünal 2007a:433, EDHIL:561).

[E.R.]

1.1.5Stem

Already Neumann 1965b identified the abstract suffix -štarr(i)-, but only Melchert (CLL:iv and Melchert 1994a:88) proposed the convincing derivation from *-sro- (with epenthesis of -t-). The fact that words with this suffix may therefore belong to the common gender i-mutating class renders obsolete a number of implausible derivations (with Hitt. -eššar/-ešn- by Neumann himself, followed in Hawkins 2000a:61; with Hitt. -ātar/-ann- in Kronasser 1966a:226; analysis as a compound in Berman 1972a:20; Starke 1986a:162 (and Starke 1990a:394f.) with mars/zaštarra- and mars/zaštarri- from an alleged -i(ya)- adjective based on a neuter abstract noun *maršaštar- and other attestations of mars/zaštarr(i)- from a likewise improbable neuter *maršaštarri(t)-).

[E.R.]

1.1.6Origin

Although mars/zaštarr(i)- is unattested in Cuneiform Luwian, its Luwian origin was recognized on account of the specifically Luwian suffix -štarr(i)- (Neumann 1965b:88, Kronasser 1966a:226; see also Starke 1990a:393-396, CLL:141, HED M:85, HHw:113, Melchert 2005a: 450, EDHIL:562).

[E.R.]

For the lemma head see CLuw. doppelter Glossenkeilmarša-.

Cross-references

Referred to from this article

Articles referring here