ḫatayann(i)-
‘drier, wiper (?)’
- Language
- Cuneiform Luwian
- Class
- Derivative
- Grammar
- subst, c.
- ID
- 2631
1. Individual Anatolian Languages
1.1 Cuneiform Luwian
ḫatayann(i)-
‘drier, wiper (?)’1.1.1Transmission
The lexeme is attested twice in the same MS manuscript belonging to a birth ritual.
[E.R.]
1.1.2Forms
| dat./loc. pl. | [ḫa-t]a-ia-an-na-an-za | KUB 35.103 ii 12’ | (CTH 766, MS) |
| ḫa-ta-ia-an-na-an-za | KUB 35.103 iii 2 | (CTH 766, MS) |
Outdated morphological analysis as acc. pl. in DLL:44. – The assignment of (-)ḫ]a-ta-ia-an-n[a(-) at KBo 60.294, 8’ to the present lemma is not assured (cf. Melchert in DCL:s.v.).
[E.R.]
1.1.3Graphic Features
Checked against the photographs in the Mainzer Fotoarchiv.
[E.R.]
1.1.4Meaning
CLuw. ḫatayann(i)- occurs twice together with kummai(ya)- ‘pure, sacred’ in a birth ritual. In spite of several attempts to elucidate the relevant passages, they are still lexically intransparent: (1)⸢pa⸣-wa i-ia-an-du Den.zu-in-zi di[ngir-zi?] (2)kum-ma-ia-an-za ḫa-ta-ia-an-na-an-za (3)⸢a⸣-pa-an ḫi-iz-za-in-du “The de[ities?] of the Den.zu-a- shall go (and) entrust her (scil. the mother) in/to the pure ḫatayann(i)-.” Carruba 1968a:18 connected ḫatayann(i)- with Hitt. ḫattant- ‘clever, wise’ ignoring its deviant spelling with geminate -tt-, because it seemed to accord well with kummai(ya)- ‘pure, sacralized’. This was tentatively accepted in CLL:65 (also Shevoroshkin 1994a:162 and HHw:47), where Melchert assumed a secondary lenition of the alveolar between unaccented vowels. However, the same scholar preferred to leave the word untranslated in a more recent study (Melchert 2007b:1f.).
In the context with kummai(ya)-, one should consider the possibility that ḫatayann(i)- is derived from the root reflected in Hitt. ḫat-(mi) ‘to dry, to become parched’. In this case, kummai(ya)- would have a more secular meaning ‘pure, clean’, and with regard to hygiene the meaning ‘dry’ would be semantically very close. If substantivized with the -ann(i)- suffix, the lexeme perhaps means something like ‘drying personnel, drier, wiper (?)’.
[E.R.]
1.1.5Stem
In contrast to the lexical problems, the stem formation of ḫatayann(i)- is clear: starting from the root ḫat- (‘to dry’, see under Meaning), a non-mutated -a- abstract noun was formed, which served as the base for a relational adjective in -i(ya)-, derived in turn with the individualizing suffix -ann(i)-.
[E.R.]

